Death penalty bill reaches House plenary | Inquirer News

Death penalty bill reaches House plenary

/ 06:24 PM February 01, 2017

The proposal to reimpose the death penalty reached the House of Representatives plenary under second reading on Wednesday.

House Bill 4727 seeking to impose the capital punishment on heinous crimes was sponsored on the floor by Deputy Speaker Capiz Rep. Fredenil Castro, an author of the bill.

The bill moved to the plenary for second reading and debates just a few months after it hurdled the committee level last December.

Article continues after this advertisement

Why it is needed?

FEATURED STORIES

In his sponsorship speech, Castro said that the proposal to revive capital punishment is not against life, precisely because it protects the lives of the innocent.

“Ang panukalang batas, kung maisabatas, ay isang kalasag ng mamamayan at Estado laban sa krimen at mga kriminal, upang maidepensa o maipagtangol ang mamamayan sa mga karumaldumal, kakilakilabot at kasuklamsuklam na krimen,” Castro said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(The proposed law, if passed, is a shield for the citizens and the state against crime, in order to protect the people from the horrendous, heinous and grisly crimes.)
“Ang panukalang batas ay hindi kalaban ng buhay; ang panukalang batas ay tagapagtangol ng buhay, buhay man ng inosente o salarin,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

(This proposed law is not anti-life; it is a protector of life, whether that be of the innocent or the guilty.)

Article continues after this advertisement

The bill restoring death penalty is seen as a priority legislation in the House of Representatives.

Who should be put to death?

Article continues after this advertisement

The bill seeks to impose death penalty on more than 20 heinous offenses, such as rape with homicide, kidnapping for ransom and arson with death.

READ: Death penalty ‘priority’ bill of lower house — Umali

Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, Duterte’s staunch ally in the House, was among the authors of the bill for the death penalty revival after former president now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo abolished capital punishment in 2006 for its failure to deter crime.

Alvarez filed the bill pursuant to President Rodrigo Duterte’s campaign promise of returning capital punishment against heinous criminals.

READ: First bill in Congress seeks reinstatement of death penalty

Alvarez’s bill sought to mete out death as punishment for heinous crimes listed under Republic Act 7659, including murder, plunder, rape, kidnapping and serious illegal detention, sale, use and possession of illegal drugs, carnapping (carjacking) with homicide, among others.

In the bill he co-authored with Castro, Alvarez said there is a need to reimpose the death penalty because “the national crime rate has grown to such alarming proportions requiring an all-out offensive against all forms of felonious acts.”

“Philippine society is left with no option but to deal with certain grievous offenders in a manner commensurate to the gravity, perversity, atrociousness and repugnance of their crimes,” according to the bill.

Duterte won the elections on a campaign promise to restore the death penalty by hanging, even making a snide remark that the convict’s head should be severed by hanging. Alvarez said Congress would look into the cheapest way for the death penalty, either by firing squad, lethal injection or by hanging./ac

RELATED STORIES

Death penalty: ‘The cheaper, the better’

Aguirre to solons: Death penalty will instill fear among criminals 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Solons warn of death penalty railroad by limiting it to drug cases 

TAGS: Crime

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.