Commission On Audit: P22-M traffic enforcers’ cut illegal | Inquirer News

Commission On Audit: P22-M traffic enforcers’ cut illegal

/ 02:05 AM October 29, 2011

Do traffic enforcers and their superiors really have to be paid extra to be persuaded to do their jobs?

No way, says the Commission on Audit (COA), which has disallowed the granting of incentives sourced from traffic fines to traffic enforcers and officials of the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA).

Traffic enforcers who go after erring motorists and untangle traffic jams are not authorized to collect a commission from the tickets they issue, the COA said in its 2010 report on the MMDA.

Article continues after this advertisement

It said the MMDA’s grant of incentives amounting to P22.5 million from 2005 to 2010 had no legal basis.

FEATURED STORIES

Refund amount

The commanders, district officers and Traffic Operations Center heads who received the incentives should be made to refund the amount, the audit agency said.

Article continues after this advertisement

It noted that the MMDA had not as yet appealed the COA’s disallowance of the payments which it issued last Jan. 6.

Article continues after this advertisement

The MMDA, in accordance with an ordinance approved by the Metro Manila Council in 2002, provides incentives to traffic enforcers and enforcement units out of the money it collects from traffic fines and penalties.

Article continues after this advertisement

The amount is supposed to be a form of assistance or support to motivate the enforcers to effectively manage traffic.

The MMDA justified the ordinance, citing the special provisions in the annual budget for issuing regulations, circulars and ordinances.

Article continues after this advertisement

Who gets how much

Of the amount collected, 20 percent is given to traffic enforcers, 15 percent to traffic commanders, 10 percent to local government units and 5 percent to traffic enforcement units.

However, the COA noted that the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) had already issued an opinion on Nov. 25, 2005, saying that the MMDA did not appear to have the authority “to grant the subject additional compensation/incentives/financial assistance arising from collections from fines and penalties.”

The opinion was sought by the MMDA itself, as it wanted to know whether or not the Metro Manila Council could give traffic enforcers incentives sourced from traffic fines without prior approval from the DBM.

The DBM said the MMDA charter contained no provision that authorized the use of fines, fees and charges for additional compensation or incentives.

No authority from DBM

It also said the MMDA was not able to get approval from the Civil Service Commission for its Employee Suggestions and Incentives Award Systems.

According to the DBM, while the Metro Manila Council can fix the compensation of MMDA personnel and officers, this does not exempt the agency from the Compensation and Position Classification Act.

Moreover, there are no DBM records to show that it has given the MMDA authority to give financial assistance to traffic enforcement units, it said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The COA said it could not allow the MMDA practice of granting incentives sourced from traffic fines to continue as it was illegal.

TAGS: Metro Manila, traffic fines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.