Duterte firm on Marcos burial: ‘The law is the law’ | Inquirer News

Duterte firm on Marcos burial: ‘The law is the law’

/ 01:18 AM November 13, 2016

president-rodrigo-duterte-ap-sona-duterte

President Rodrigo Duterte. AP

President Duterte is standing firm on his decision to allow the burial of dictator Ferdinand Marcos at Libingan ng mga Bayani, saying he was just strictly following the law, unaffected by any emotions.

Mr. Duterte said the law allows a former president or a soldier to be buried at Libingan and does not impose any other conditions. His position has been echoed in the ruling by the Supreme Court, which voted 9-5 on Tuesday to clear the legal obstacles to the burial.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: SC votes, 9-5, for burial of Marcos at Libingan

FEATURED STORIES

“The law is the law. It has no emotions at all. It says that if you are a President (you can be buried there). It does not say you have a record of a dictatorship or what not, or being a gentle despot. It does not say anything like that,” Mr. Duterte said in a speech late on Friday at an event to recognize the humanitarian deeds of his late mother, Soledad Duterte.

Insult, desecration

Article continues after this advertisement

The President’s decision to allow the former dictator a hero’s burial has outraged martial law victims and their families, who view the move as an insult and a desecration of the spirit of people power that ousted Marcos 30 years ago.

Article continues after this advertisement

The opposition to a hero’s burial for Marcos has broadened after the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), one of the country’s top historians and a Catholic Church group joined calls on the President to reverse his decision.

Article continues after this advertisement

“President Duterte must be advised against proceeding with such a plan,” the CPP said in a statement on Saturday. “Such payment of political debt to the Marcoses will undoubtedly be regarded as an act of contempt against the Filipino people’s historic judgement against the Marcos dictatorship.”

The CPP, which resumed peace talks under the Duterte administration, said burying Marcos at Libingan will be “the ultimate act of rehabilitation” of the Marcoses after their downfall.

Article continues after this advertisement

 

Heed history’s demands

In a letter to the President on Friday, National Historical Commission (NHC) chair Maria Serena Diokno said Mr. Duterte had the “unique opportunity and obligation to heed the demands of the justice of history” that will lead to “true healing.”

Diokno said there were also “historical grounds” to stop Marcos’ burial at Libingan based on a recent study of the late president’s war record, citing the “highly questionable” medals the dictator claimed to have received from the US government.

“The justice of history, anchored on historical truth, is far greater than that which any court, including the highest court of the land, can render (or in this case, fail to render),” she said.

The Council of the Laity of the Philippines called the high court’s decision “a barefaced disrespect to the victims of one of the darkest moments in the history of our people and our country in general.”

“Marcos may have been a President but he ended up a dictator; he may have been a soldier but his grave abuse of power and systemic violence undermines his well-flaunted valor,” the group said. “There can never be peace without truth and justice.” —WITH REPORTS FROM LEILA B. SALAVERRIA, KARLOS MANLUPIG, KRITINE FELISSE MANGUNAY, JULIE M. AURELIO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.