CA grants bail to ex-Pagadian City Mayor Samuel Co | Inquirer News

CA grants bail to ex-Pagadian City Mayor Samuel Co

/ 05:11 PM October 27, 2016

samuel-co

Former Pagadian City Mayor Samuel S. Co. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The Court of Appeals (CA) has allowed the release on bail of former Pagadian City Mayor Samuel Co who is facing a case of syndicated estafa for his alleged involvement in the reported P12-billion Aman Futures investment scam.

In an 18-page decision, the appeals court’s Special Eleventh Division through Associate Justice Sesinando Villon reversed and set aside the May 11, 2015 order issued by Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 14 Judge Albert J. Tenorio.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Investment scam: Third estafa complaint filed vs Pagadian City Mayor Samuel Co

Tenorio denied Co’s application for bail but granted the bail bid of the latter’s wife Priscilla. The Manila Court, orders dated Aug. 24 and Dec. 15, 2015, also denied Co’s motion for reconsideration.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Ex-Pagadian City Mayor, wife arrested for estafa

The Manila Court, in denying Co’s bail bid, gave weight to the allegation that the former local chief executive used his position as Pagadian City mayor to induce the victims to invest their money in Aman Futures.

The lower court also noted that the issuance of a temporary business permit showed complicity with the perpetrators of the scam.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the appeals court said “this court finds that these unsubstantiated allegations do not constitute strong evidence of guilt on the part of petitioner, as would warrant the denial of his plea for provisional liberty.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The appeals court said records showed that the victims did not directly transact with Co to accuse him of using his position to influence Aman Future’s investors.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Petitioner was not even present before, during or after the time [the victim] made his investments,” the appeals court said.

The CA added that the issuance of licenses and business permits “merely shows that it complied with the requirement of submission of the requisite documents pertinent to the application, and nothing more. It does not establish petitioner’s complicity with the business of the persons in whose favor the temporary business permit were issued.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The appeals court added that there was also no evidence showing that Co invited the public to invest in Aman through the radio or through an organized barangay (town hall) meeting.

“All told, the evidence of the prosecution has failed to establish strong evidence of petitioner’s participation in the alleged fraudulent scheme of Aman Futures. The prosecution failed to prove that petitioner performed any overt act in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy,” the appeals court said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Co was ordered to post a cash bond of P500,000 for his temporary liberty unless he has other pending cases. RAM/rga

TAGS: Aman Futures, Court of Appeals

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.