'Budget for real change' passed in House; solon claims violation of law | Inquirer News

‘Budget for real change’ passed in House; solon claims violation of law

By: - Reporter / @NikkoDizonINQ
/ 07:27 PM October 19, 2016

house-of-representatives_3

House of Representatives (Photo by Hotaru Niitsu/INQUIRER.net)

MANILA — The House of Representatives on Wednesday approved the so-called national “budget for real change” of the Duterte administration amounting to P3.35 trillion for 2017.

There was hardly any opposition to the budget’s approval, except for a point raised by opposition lawmaker Albay Representative Edcel Lagman. The final voting at the third and final reading was 243-5-1.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman, the lone abstention, clarified he was not against the passage of the national budget.

FEATURED STORIES

But he expressed “grave reservation” that President Duterte’s Oct. 11 letter certifying as urgent the passage of House Bill No. 3408 or the 2017 General Appropriations Act (GAA) failed to comply with the conditions set by the Constitution.

Lagman quoted Section 26, Article VI of the Constitution as stating that “no bill passed by either House shall become a law unless it has passed three readings on separate days, and printed copies thereof in its final form had been distributed to its Members three days before its passage, except when the President certifies to the necessity of its immediate enactment to meet a public calamity and emergency.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The President’s letter to House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez III failed to mention any public calamity and emergency.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mr. Duterte said that the immediate enactment of the 2017 national budget was needed to “maintain continuous government operations following the end of the current fiscal year (FY), to expedite the funding of various programs, projects, and activities for (FY) 2017, and to ensure budgetary preparedness that will enable the government to effectively perform its Constitutional mandate.”

“The reasons are contingent on the end of fiscal year 2016 and the start of fiscal year 2017, which are more than two months from now,” Lagman said.  SFM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Edcel Lagman, House of Representatives

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.