Clinton defends handling of classified information at State | Inquirer News

Clinton defends handling of classified information at State

/ 09:37 AM September 08, 2016
Hillary Clinton

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a “commander in chief forum” hosted by NBC in New York on Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2016. AP

NEW YORK — Hillary Clinton defended anew her handling of classified information as secretary of state Wednesday night, insisting she did not jeopardize national security by discussing the Obama administration’s drone program and other sensitive matters on a personal email account.

Speaking at a televised national security forum, Clinton also defended her support for US military intervention in Libya, despite the chaos that has consumed that country since then. The Democratic nominee urged voters to weigh her readiness to be president not based on one decision but “on the totality of my record.”


Clinton and Republican Donald Trump spoke back-to-back but not face-to-face at the forum, hosted by NBC. The candidates also took questions from an audience of veterans and active-duty troops gathered on the decommissioned USS Intrepid, which is now a floating museum in New York.

With Clinton and Trump taking the same stage, the forum served as something of a preview for the candidates’ upcoming debates.


By virtue of a coin flip, Clinton took the stage first. She quickly faced a barrage of questions about her email use at the State Department, where she used a personal email address and a private server.

The FBI found that some emails sent or received by Clinton contained classified information, but Director James Comey did not recommend she face prosecution. According to notes released from Clinton’s interview with the FBI, she said she relied on others with knowledge about handling classified files.

Clinton drew an implicit contrast with Trump when asked for the most important quality a commander in chief must possess.

“Steadiness, an absolute rock steadiness, mixed with strength to make the hard decisions,” she said.

READ: Clinton: He’s a national security danger. Trump: No, she is

Clinton has spent much of the summer trying to paint Trump as ill-prepared to be commander in chief and too unpredictable to make decisions that put American service members in harm’s way. Her case has been bolstered by numerous Republican national security experts who have spoken out against their party’s nominee, including former Defense Secretary William Cohen who announced his support for Clinton on Wednesday.

Clinton could also be vulnerable to Americans’ worries about terrorism — particularly the Islamic State’s designs on the West — and criticism that President Barack Obama hasn’t done enough to combat extremism emanating from the Middle East. While she’s articulated an anti-Islamic State plan that is more aggressive than Obama’s, she’s largely in line with the president on foreign policy.


She said she couldn’t promise there would be no terror attacks on US soil if she becomes president, calling preventing terrorism “a huge challenge.”

Ahead of the forum, Trump rolled out a new plan to boost military spending by tens of billions of dollars, including major increases in the number of active troops, fighter planes, Navy ships and submarines. The Republican also said that, if elected, he would give military leaders 30 days to formulate a multipronged plan to defeat the Islamic State group.

“This will require military warfare, but also cyberwarfare, financial warfare and ideological warfare,” Trump said during an address in Philadelphia.

Trump’s address also included plans to eliminate deep spending cuts known as the “sequester” that were enacted when Congress failed to reach a budget compromise in 2011. Republicans and Democrats voted for the automatic, across-the board cuts that affected both military and domestic programs, though the White House has long pressed Congress to lift the spending limits.

Trump expressed support for the sequester in interviews in 2013 — even describing them as too small — but seemed to suggest at the time that military spending should be exempt.

A senior adviser said ahead of the speech that Trump would make sure the additional spending was fully paid for but did not explain how.

The United States currently spends more than $600 billion a year on the military, more than the next seven countries combined.

Even before promising a huge boost in military spending, Trump’s plans to cut taxes, expand infrastructure spending and leave untouched entitlement programs such as Social Security already threaten to add trillions of dollars to the federal deficit.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: classified information, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2021 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.