Nuclear power 'a good option' for PH—Cusi | Inquirer News

Nuclear power ‘a good option’ for PH—Cusi

By: - Reporter / @TarraINQ
/ 12:25 PM August 31, 2016

Bataan Nuclear Power Plant  AFP FILE PHOTO

Bataan Nuclear Power Plant AFP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Despite doubts on its safety, nuclear power is “a good option” for the Philippines.

Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi said this before the Senate on Wednesday as he bared that the Department of Energy (DOE) has initiated a study on the possible utility of the mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP).

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: For gov’t, nuclear energy now a viable option

FEATURED STORIES

At hearing of the Senate committee on energy, Cusi said nuclear power was among options that the DOE was pursuing to ensure long-term energy stability for the country, along with other power sources.

“Based on my knowledge, based on what I’ve seen, based on what I studied, based on the experience of other countries that we have heard, it is a good option for our country. It is safe to use,” said Cusi when Sen. Leila De Lima sought his categorical response on the use of the BNPP.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The hard fact is that even while nuclear power is unpopular, we’re looking at it, we’re studying it. It’s an option,” he told the hearing chair by Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the nuclear option was under consideration as the DOE endeavors to build a 30,189 megawatt (MW) reliable supply for the country by 2030, given the forecast demand and anticipated economic growth.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: PH gov’t considers nuclear energy as int’l conference kicks off

The current national energy supply is at 17,925 MW, sufficient for the demand for 13,500 MWs. Cusi said the supply is only compromised by unexpected outages and simultaneous maintenance shutdowns of powerplants, a situation that led to the supply shortage in Luzon a month ago.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cusi pointed out that nuclear power was viable as it is cheap to produce and has greater longevity than other depletable sources such as natural gas and coal.

“Coal and fuel has a lifespan. Nuclear power has a longer life, so we will have a more secure [supply]. The hard fact is that we know that nuclear power is not popular, but it is our responsibility to look at it and study it for nation-builiding,” he said.

He cited the wide use of nuclear power in other countries, including Indonesia, where the Philippines sources its coal.

The BNPP, built in the 1970s at $2 billion, has never produced a single kilowatt, as Sen. Richard Gordon noted. It has been maintained at an annual cost of P27 million.

Cusi said the DOE will “go through the process” in deciding on its operation, adding that the public will be consulted about the option. Opening the power plant will cost an estimated $1 billion. RAM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: BNPP, DoE, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.