Speaker not fussy about death penalty method | Inquirer News

Speaker not fussy about death penalty method

/ 03:16 PM August 09, 2016

Speaker Davao Del Norte Rep. Pantaleon "Bebot" Alvarez. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE

Speaker Davao Del Norte Rep. Pantaleon “Bebot” Alvarez.
INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE

Speaker Pantaleon “Bebot” Alvarez on Tuesday said he would not mind hanging as a method of death penalty on people convicted of heinous crimes.

“Parehong death yan. Hindi na natin dapat pagtalunan niyan kung by hanging, firing squad, or lethal injection. Parehong patay yan,” Alvarez said in an interview after his meeting with Senate President Koko Pimentel at Edsa Shangri-La Hotel on Tuesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

(It’s all death penalty. We don’t need to discuss if it will happen by hanging, firing squad or administering lethal injection. It will all lead to death.)

FEATURED STORIES

Alvarez was asked for his reaction to the privilege speech of Senator Manny Pacquiao, who during interpellation said death by hanging by kicking the chair supporting the convict is the cheapest way to implement capital punishment.

READ: Manny explains death by hanging: ‘Sisipain lang po yung upuan’ 

Article continues after this advertisement

“Okay lang sa akin ‘yun, wala akong problema dun. Sabi nga ni Senator Pacquiao, mas mura sisipain lang ‘yung upuan,” Alvarez said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(I have no issues there. As Senator Pacquiao said, it will be more convenient if we just kick the chair.)

Article continues after this advertisement

Alvarez said his proposal to revive the death penalty filed in the House of Representatives did not give a specific method of implementing death penalty.

“Proposal ko, walang (method), basta restoration of death penalty lang (My proposal did not include a method, as long as the death penalty is restored),” Alvarez said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Asked about the criticism that President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs has targeted the poor, Alvarez downplayed the number of people killed compared to the thousands of drug users who surrendered.

“Libo-libo na ang mahihirap na sumurrender all over the country. Six hundred thousand. Ilan ang namatay? Kakaunti lang ‘yun kung percentage-wise dun sa nag-surrender. I think that is a very unfair statement,” Alvarez said.

(Thousands of poor all over the country have surrendered. Six hundred thousand. How many of them were killed? They are quite a few percentage-wise compared with those who surrendered.)

READ: Solon: Duterte’s anti-drug drive spawns new ‘class war’ 

Alvarez  filed the bill seeking to reimpose the death penalty after former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo abolished capital punishment in 2006.

Alvarez filed the bill to reinstate death penalty pursuant to Duterte’s campaign promise to return capital punishment against heinous criminals.

 READ: First bill in Congress seeks reinstatement of death penalty

Alvarez’s bill sought to reimpose death penalty on heinous crimes listed under Republic Act 7659, including murder, plunder, rape, kidnapping and serious illegal detention, sale, use and possession of illegal drugs, carnapping with homicide, among others.

In the bill he co-authored with Deputy Speaker Capiz Rep. Fredenil Castro, Alvarez said there is a need to reimpose the death penalty because “the national crime rate has grown to such alarming proportions requiring an all-out offensive against all forms of felonious acts.”

“Philippine society is left with no option but to deal with certain grievous offenders in a manner commensurate to the gravity, perversity, atrociousness and repugnance of their crimes,” according to the bill. IDL/rga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEOS

TAGS: Congress, Firing Squad, Hanging, Legislation

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.