6 in 10 Inquirer readers say no to ‘911’ call charge | Inquirer News

6 in 10 Inquirer readers say no to ‘911’ call charge

/ 02:19 PM July 29, 2016

A majority of INQUIRER.net readers and followers on social media said telecommunication companies should not charge the public for calling the 911 emergency hotline, an online survey showed.

The informal survey, conducted on social media sites Facebook and Twitter, showed that six in 10 respondents said “no” when asked if the companies should charge callers to discourage prank calls.

SCREENGRAB FROM TWITTER

SCREENGRAB FROM TWITTER

On Twitter, 1,185 netizens responded to the survey, results of which showed 64 percent saying no and 29 percent saying yes. Seven percent remained uncertain.

Article continues after this advertisement
SCREENGRAB FROM FACEBOOK

SCREENGRAB FROM FACEBOOK

Meanwhile, out of the 1,130 Facebook users, 65 percent said they disagreed with the plan of the telecommunication companies while 30 percent agreed. Five percent said they “can’t say” or decide on the issue.

FEATURED STORIES

Globe Telecom earlier said that it was ready to comply with the government directive to launch the country’s emergency hotline. However, it said it will charge 911 callers an additional P5 on top of regular voice charges. It said the higher charge is supposed to discourage prank callers. KS/IDL/rga

READ: Globe to charge 911 calls to discourage prank calls

Article continues after this advertisement

 

(Editor’s note: The Inquirer poll is not a scientific tool and is only meant to measure the pulse of its readers.)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: 9/11, Globe, poll, survey

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.