SC junks petition seeking to void Comelec extension of SOCE deadline | Inquirer News

SC junks petition seeking to void Comelec extension of SOCE deadline

/ 07:39 PM June 28, 2016

The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday dismissed a petition that sought to nullify the Commission on Elections (Comelec) decision extending the deadline for the filing of the statement of contributions and expenditures (SOCE) upon the request of the administration’s Liberal Party (LP).

In a press conference, high court’s information chief Atty. Theodore Te said the SC dismissed the petition filed by Atty. Manuelito Luna of 1-Abilidad party-list and retired Army Colonel Justino Padiernos on technicality.

READ: LP submits SOCE 6 days after deadline; Roxas to file within the week

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court said petitioners failed to attach a certified true copy of Comelec resolution as required under Rule 64 Section 5 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: SC asked to nullify Comelec decision to extend SOCE deadline

“Petitioners merely submitted news reports in lieu of the required number of the assailed resolution. As petitioner failed to state the exact date of promulgation of the assailed resolution, the averments regarding the timeliness of petition are also defective,” the high court’s ruling stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We remind petitioners that this Court cannot act upon a petition for certiorari that does not contain the assailed issuances and wholly relies upon printed news accounts. In sum, the failure of the instant petition to comply with these basic requirements constitutes a sufficient reason for its dismissal,” the Court added.

Article continues after this advertisement

In their petition, Luna and Padiernos accused the Comelec of committing grave abuse of discretion when it extended the deadline for SOCE submission.

Article continues after this advertisement

Petitioners said extending the SOCE deadline is tantamount “to an impermissible amendment of Section 14 of RA7166.”

“There is no substantive justification for the Commission (Comelec) to disregard the ‘final and non-extendible deadline’ prescribed by Sec. 14 of RA 7166,” the petitioners said. Kristina Casandra Tayam, INQUIRER.net trainee/RAM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Comelec, Commission on Elections, Liberal Party, SOCE, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.