VP bets agree on anti-dynasty law; hesitate on plans to run as president | Inquirer News

VP bets agree on anti-dynasty law; hesitate on plans to run as president

/ 08:39 PM April 10, 2016

For a group of candidates who spent more than two hours arguing with each other, their stand on various issues does not differ that much.

At least according to the Yes or No portion of the vice presidential debate at the University of Santo Tomas on Sunday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Despite disagreements on the definition and views on political dynasties, all six candidates — Senators Alan Peter Cayetano, Francis Escudero, Gringo Honasan, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Antonio Trillanes IV; and Camarines Sur Rep. Leni Robredo — agreed that it is about time to pass an anti-dynasty law.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Marcos on political dynasties: Look beyond names

While the Philippine Constitution prohibits political dynasties, it requires the passage of an implementing bill.

Article continues after this advertisement

Of the six candidates, Escudero and Marcos acknowlegded that they belong to political dynasties or families.

Article continues after this advertisement

All of them raised the red “no” card when asked whether they support same-sex marriage while everyone said yes when asked if they will hold telecommunications companies accountable for the slow internet connection in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

They said no when asked if the country is “doing enough to address the urgency of climate change.

Plans to run for president

However, a number of them also hesitated in answering various questions.

Of the six candidates, Robredo was the first to raise her “no” card when asked if they have future plans to run for president. She was followed by Honasan.

Cayetano was the third one to raise his card but it was raised sidewards. He later explained that he is not sure although he has no plans at the moment.

Escudero and Marcos hesitated but eventually raised their no cards.

Trillanes refused to answer. “It needs to be qualified because it’s not that simple to answer,” he said.

Confused or hesitant?

When asked if they have engaged in any corrupt activities, Marcos mistakenly raised the green or yes card. He later changed his answer to no when he realized his mistake.

Everyone agreed that income tax should be lowered but Honasan was slow in answering. He initially answered no but changed his choice after asking for the question to be repeated.

Cayetano: Yes to death penalty for corrupt officials

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Only Cayetano, running mate of Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte, voted yes when asked if corruption should be included in the list of crimes that would merit a death penalty. CDG

RELATED STORIES
Cayetano: I will resign as VP if PH streets remain unsafe

Binay boos Trillanes over corruption allegations in VP debate

RELATED VIDEOS

TAGS: Comelec, Commission on Elections, debate, Francis Escudero, Leni Robredo, UST debate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.