QCRTC stops DOTC, LTFRB from issuing permits to operate Uber, GrabCar | Inquirer News
FOR 20 DAYS

QCRTC stops DOTC, LTFRB from issuing permits to operate Uber, GrabCar

/ 12:09 PM December 04, 2015

The Quezon City Regional Trial Court 217 has stopped for 20 days the accepting, processing and approval of permits to operate Uber and GrabCar operations under Transportation Network Vehicle Service (TNVS) without a certificate of public convenience (CPC).

In a nine-page order, QCRTC Judge Santiago Arenas issued the 20-day restraining order against the implementation of Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) Department Order No. 2015-11, Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) Memorandum Circulars Memorandum Circulars 2015-15, 16, 17 and 18 and other issuances related to TNVS.

The said issuances pertain to accreditation, conditions and implementing guidelines to operate TNVS.

Article continues after this advertisement

DOTC, under DO 2015-11, was amended to promote mobility and encourage innovations in public transport.

FEATURED STORIES

The restraining order was granted in favor of Angat Tsuper Samahan ng mga Tsuper at Operator ng Pilipinas Genuine Organizatio  TransportCoalition (Stop & Go).

In their petition, they assailed TNVS for being able to operate even without a CPC unlike other modes of transport like taxi.

Article continues after this advertisement

CPC is an authorization issued for the operation of public services for which no franchise, either municipal or legislative, is required by law, such as a common carrier.

Article continues after this advertisement

Petitioner said what the car owners have to do is simply secure a membership from Transportation Network Companies (TNC), equip themselves with the necessary technology and can already operate once given a provisional authority.

Article continues after this advertisement

The petitioners blamed such an easy procedure for the increase in car sales, heavy traffic and decline in income of taxi operators and drivers.

“This resulted in the increase in sales of cars and other motor vehicles… This could be one of the reasons of the present heavy traffic in the metropolis,” petitioner said.

Article continues after this advertisement

They also added that TNC and TNVS could be the reason for LTFRB’s continued denial of their application for CPCs.

The court said initial findings showed that Stop & Go met the requisites for a temporary restraining order including establishing a material invasion of their rights to operate public utility vehicles and grave and irreparable injury and damage specifically to their income “due to sudden uncontrolled increase in TNVS utility running the streets of Metro Manila.”

With the restraining order, the court stopped DOTC and LTFRB from accepting, processing and approving applications from TNVS.

The court set a hearing on Dec. 8 to determine if the restraining order will be made permanent or not. RAM

Below are the photos of the nine-page order:

1tro2tro3tro4tro5trp6tro7tro8tro9tro

RELATED STORIES

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Transpo group claims Uber, GrabCar worsen traffic in Metro

LTFRB: Nothing wrong with ‘surge pricing’ in Uber, GrabCar

TAGS: Grabcar, Quezon City, TNVS, Uber

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.