US-China summit takes place amid human rights crackdown
In this Sept. 3, 2015 file photo, Chinese President Xi Jinping is displayed on a big screen as Type 99A2 Chinese battle tanks roll across during a parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of Japan’s surrender during World War II in Beijing. As Xi makes his first state visit to Washington this week, the outlook for relations is decidedly murkier than when he hosted President Barack Obama at their last summit less than a year ago. Xi presided over the massive military parade that showcased the growing might of the People’s Liberation Army. The event was a hit among the Chinese public, but it was criticized abroad as threatening in appearance and unhelpful to reconciliation with World War II antagonist Japan. AP FILE PHOTO
WASHINGTON — The United States has warned that the toughest crackdown in years on Chinese activists threatens to cloud the high-profile state visit by President Xi Jinping. Yet human rights is unlikely to dominate the agenda when Xi is welcomed at the White House on Friday.
As China emerges as an economic and military rival that Washington both competes and cooperates with, other issues tend to get top billing at the summit table. Prime US concerns are cybercrime, China’s island-building in the disputed South China Sea and building momentum for a global deal to combat climate change.
But human rights will still get attention.
Since taking the presidency in 2013 and becoming the most powerful Chinese leader in three decades, Xi has cracked down on encroachment of what he views as Western-style freedoms in China’s increasingly prosperous and connected society. His administration has also tightened controls on religious minorities, including a government campaign to remove crosses and demolish Christian churches in an eastern province — a move that has drawn condemnation in the US Congress.
Ten US senators have voiced concern over Xi’s “extraordinary assault” on civil society ahead of the pomp-filled summit. This summer, Chinese authorities rounded up more than 250 human rights lawyers and associates. According to Human Rights Watch, 22 are still being held.
US concerns go beyond oppression of government critics. US officials have said that draft legislation in China to police non-governmental organizations could have an impact not just on foreign human rights activists but on the personal and corporate privacy of academics and business groups — a potential setback to deepening the US-China relationship even in the areas that aren’t politically contentious. A lack of candor in Chinese state media reports about economic turmoil roiling global markets has also exposed the risks and limitations inherent in Beijing’s strict press controls.
“The US is not short of entry points to discuss human rights with China,” said Sophie Richardson of Human Rights Watch. “The US is in an excellent position to make the case that better human rights protections are not just about defending the activist community in China.”
At a dialogue with China on the issue last month, Assistant Secretary of State Tom Malinowski said that improvements on human rights were needed by China to set a positive tone for the summit.
But when David Saperstein, the US ambassador at-large for religious freedom, visited China a couple of weeks later, authorities detained a Christian lawyer the day before Saperstein was due to meet him and detained and harassed other religious figures whom he met. Saperstein called the actions “outrageous.”
Although Chinese society has opened up since Washington and Beijing restored diplomatic ties 36 years ago, the Communist Party retains a monopoly on political power. According to the State Department, there are tens of thousands of political prisoners. They include Liu Xiaobo, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the year after President Barack Obama. Liu is serving 11 years in prison after calling for democratic reforms.
Foreign governments have for the most part become less willing to speak out over rights abuses as China’s economic heft has grown. The US remains outspoken, and Beijing’s preferred response is to deflect criticism by addressing it in closeted diplomatic settings on its own terms.
“We should see a bigger picture: How do we seek more cooperation between each other while shelving these differences?” said Li Junhua, who led China’s delegation at last month’s human rights dialogue.
Although US officials maintain that human rights is on the agenda of its high-level meetings with China, it shapes the relationship less than it did a quarter-century ago. When China cracked down on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989, killing hundreds, it had direct and negative consequences, as the US scaled down ties.
“The Chinese government recognizes that there will be no cost in their relationship with the United States for continuing to crack down, and if there’s no cost, then of course they are going to continue what they’re doing,” said Carolyn Bartholomew, a member of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission which advises Congress.
China’s rights record still has the potential, however, to grab attention at US-China summits.
In 2006, a practitioner of the persecuted spiritual group, Falun Gong, heckled Chinese leader Hu Jintao at the White House. When he visited again in 2011 on a state visit hosted by Obama, Hu conceded that “a lot still needs to be done in China, in terms of human rights.”
Xi appears less pliant.
At a November summit with Obama in Beijing, Xi was confronted at a news conference over difficulties faced by some US news organizations in securing visas to cover China. Xi responded with a lecture, using a Chinese proverb to suggest the problem lay not with Chinese authorities but the news outlets themselves.
RELATED STORIES
China warns US: Avoid conflict or face disaster
Tensions to mark Xi’s White House visit
