Clerk asks US top court for OK to deny gay marriage licenses | Inquirer News

Clerk asks US top court for OK to deny gay marriage licenses

/ 08:00 AM August 29, 2015

Kim Davis, Roger Gannam

In this July 20, 2015 file photo, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, right, walks with her attorney Roger Gannam into the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky in Covington, Ky. The Rowan County, Ky., clerk’s office turned away gay couples who sought marriage licenses on Thursday, Aug. 13, 2015, defying a federal judge’s order that said deeply held Christian beliefs don’t excuse officials from following the law. The fight in Rowan County began soon after the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide in June. Davis cited her religious beliefs and decided not to issue marriage licenses to any couple, gay or straight. AP FILE PHOTO

FRANKFORT, Kentucky — Two months after it legalized gay marriage nationwide, the US Supreme Court is being asked by a Kentucky county clerk for permission to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis objects to same-sex marriage for religious reasons. The Supreme Court says the constitution guarantees gay people have the right to marry, but Davis contends the First Amendment guarantees her the right of religious freedom.

Article continues after this advertisement

She stopped issuing all marriage licenses the day after the court effectively legalized gay marriage nationwide in June.

FEATURED STORIES

Two gay couples and two straight couples sued Davis, arguing she must fulfill her duties as an elected official. A federal judge ordered Davis to issue the licenses, and an appeals court upheld that decision.

Davis’ lawyers said they petitioned the Supreme Court on Friday to delay that decision until her appeal is finished, which could take months.

Article continues after this advertisement

Her attorneys with the Christian law firm Liberty Counsel wrote in their appeal that Davis is seeking “asylum for her conscience.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Justice Elena Kagan, who joined the majority opinion in June, will hear Davis’ case. Kagan could reject it in a matter of days, or she could ask the couples’ attorneys to file a response and refer it to court for review.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dan Canon, an attorney representing the couples, called Davis’ latest challenge “meritless.”

Davis has refused to comply with several court orders in recent weeks. She says gay couples could easily drive to a nearby county to get a marriage license. But gay couples argue they have a right to get a marriage license in the county where they live, work and pay taxes.

Article continues after this advertisement

Davis has said she will not resign her $80,000-a-year job and will never issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, even if the Supreme Court denies her request.

Her attorney, Jonathan D. Christman, wrote that forcing her to issue licenses is akin to forcing a person who objects to war into the battlefield, or forcing a person against capital punishment to carry out an execution.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Davis cannot be fired because she is an elected official. The Legislature could impeach her, but that is unlikely given that many state lawmakers share her beliefs. The Republican president of the state Senate spoke at a rally last week in support of Davis.

TAGS: Gay couples, Kentucky

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.