2010-2015 Sona promises: Kept /not yet kept (Part 3)
Education and health
By Almi Ilagan-Atienza , Inquirer Research
PROMISE: A “globally competitive basic education cycle” expanded from 10 years to the global standard of 12 years. (Sona 2010)
The new K to 12 (Kindergarten to Grade 12) curriculum had been implemented as of February 2014, and the first batch of high school students to go through it will graduate in March 2018. The program has been met not just with protests. There are at least five petitions in the Supreme Court against the K to 12 Law, or Republic Act No. 10533.
***
Article continues after this advertisementPromise: End the backlog in education: 66,800 classrooms, 2,573,212 chairs, and 61.7 million textbooks to achieve the one-to-one ratio of books and students. (Sona 2010 and 2012)
Article continues after this advertisementThe Department of Education (DepEd) reported that it had constructed 86,478 classrooms as of February 2015, enough to fill the backlog of 66,800 classrooms in 2010. The DepEd also reported 1:1 student-textbook and student-school seat ratios since December 2012. Even as it copes with the annual increase in enrollment, the regular wear and tear of school equipment and resources, and the effects of natural disasters, the DepEd faces the prospect of more shortages as the K to 12 program introduces two additional years of senior high school.
In its latest report to Congress, the DepEd states that every additional year in the basic education system requires 20,000 to 28,000 public classrooms, which translates to a 40,000 to 56,000 additional classroom shortage for the two-year senior high school program. As a result, the official classroom shortage, to include the requirements for the K to 12 program, will reach more than 95,000.
In June 2015, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) released P31.8 billion to build and rehabilitate 22,325 classrooms across the country, in line with the implementation of the K to 12 program.
The DepEd says an additional 60,000 to 82,000 teachers will be needed to implement the senior high school program. The K to 12 program also requires the printing of a minimum of 60 million textbooks since the textbooks designed for the old 10-year curriculum will now be obsolete.
***
Promise: Increase the budget of state universities and colleges (SUCs) to P43.61 billion in 2013. (Sona 2012)
The budget for SUCs was increased from P23.8 billion in 2012 to P34.9 million in 2013. Although it has been increasing year-on-year, from P23.8 billion in 2010 to P43.3 billion in 2015, the SUC budget has still not reached the P43.61 billion that was promised two years ago.
The 2015 allocation included P3.5 billion for scholarships under SUCs, P2.2 billion for Commission on Higher Education scholarships and P316 million research fund.
***
Promise: Expand PhilHealth coverage by identifying the correct number of Filipinos in urgent need of PhilHealth coverage. Continue to implement the Department of Social Welfare and Development’s national household targeting system for poverty reduction, or Listahanan. (Sona 2010)
Prompted by recent typhoons, floods and other natural disasters that left many families poor, homeless and jobless in various parts of the country, the Listahanan survey is currently being conducted for the second time, with a target of 15.3 million households. The survey, aimed at building an information management system that will pinpoint who and where the poor families are, will serve as the basis for identifying the beneficiaries of social protection programs.
In December 2014, a Commission on Audit (COA) report said the DSWD handed out more than P1 billion to about 364,000 families whose names were “missing” from the Listahanan database. There were also double payments to people whose names appeared on the list twice. The COA said P168.122 million was also given to 21,117 “nonpoor beneficiaries.”
The DSWD claimed that the problem involved only the documentation process and that the COA did not see any suspicions of misuse or misappropriation of the funds.
***
Promise: Pass two health-related bills: the sin tax bill aimed at raising more revenues to fund universal healthcare, and the reproductive health (RH) bill to help address potential education backlogs because of the continuing increase in the student population. (Sona 2012)
The Sin Tax Reform Law was signed in December 2012 and came into effect in January 2013. In the first two years of its implementation, the sin tax has generated an additional P102 billion—of which 18 percent came from taxes levied on tobacco products—to finance universal healthcare and health infrastructure programs, according to the Department of Finance.
The share of total tobacco and alcohol excise tax collections amounted to 0.9 percent of gross domestic product for 2013 and 2014, reportedly the highest since 2000. Funding for the Department of Health increased to P83.7 billion in 2014 (from P53.3 billion in 2013), and P87 billion in 2015.
The budget allocation for health insurance premiums for the poor increased from P12.6 billion in 2013 to P35.3 billion in 2014. Of the total registered PhilHealth members in 2014, 40.4 percent were from the indigent sector, against the 16.5 percent in 2013.
Also signed in December 2012, the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act was stopped from being implemented by a Supreme Court’s status quo ante order just two months after it became effective on Jan. 17, 2013.
In July 2014, the high court unanimously declared the law “not unconstitutional,” but upheld its April 8 ruling that rejected eight of the law’s provisions. The provisions include those pertaining to providing minors access to contraceptives without parental consent; penalizing health-care providers for refusing or failing to disseminate information about RH programs; requiring parental consent for a minor in nonemergency situations; and penalizing public officers who refuse to support RH programs.
In a resolution issued on June 17, the high tribunal stopped the government from “procuring, selling, distributing, dispensing and administering, advertising and promoting” contraceptive implants, pending the high court’s final disposition of an appeal to permanently ban the product for its alleged “abortifacient” side effects. Sources: Inquirer archives, DBM and DepEd websites, Official Gazette website