Who'll be spared from 3rd PDAF scam cases? DOJ still checking | Inquirer News

Who’ll be spared from 3rd PDAF scam cases? DOJ still checking

/ 03:18 PM June 02, 2015

JUSTICE Secretary Leila de Lima on Tuesday said her office is still determining if some of those implicated in the third batch of pork barrel scam cases will be spared or not due to forged signatures.

De Lima said of the names implicated, three or four told the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) that their signatures were forged.

“They are professing innocence or non-involvement in the scam because according to them, their signatures were in the first place forged,” de Lima said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Kaya ayun nga pinapa-review ko very thoroughly para sigurado tama ang pag-refer sa Ombudsman kung ma-approve ko lahat yun,” de Lima told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

One of those implicated is Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) Chief Joel Villanueva, a known ally of President Benigno Aquino III, who will reportedly run for senator under the Liberal Party next year.

But de Lima pointed out that political affiliations have no bearing in their investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We do not look at the political [affiliation] of any of our subjects for investigation. I keep on stressing that even sa first and second batches. Hindi ho kasama yan sa consideration. What we consider is the evidence. We always consider the evidence, if there is enough basis to refer the case to the Ombudsman,” de Lima added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Justice Undersecretary Jose Justiniano earlier said they will forward their recommendation to de Lima who has the discretion to amend it or approve it as it is.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Lima and Justiniano will meet on Wednesday to discuss their recommendation.

Still, de Lima clarified that even if the case has been referred to the Ombudsman, the anti-graft body will still have to decide if they will conduct further fact-finding investigation or ask the respondents to submit their counter-affidavit.

Article continues after this advertisement

She said the Ombudsman has final say on the case. AC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.