SC suspends Olongapo City judge on charges of bribe try, inefficiency, conflict of interest | Inquirer News

SC suspends Olongapo City judge on charges of bribe try, inefficiency, conflict of interest

By: - Reporter / @TarraINQ
/ 08:20 PM March 25, 2015

MANILA, Philippines – As part of its continuing campaign to instill discipline among officers of the court, the Supreme Court has suspended an Olongapo City judge as he faced investigation for alleged corruption and slacking off while on the job.

In a resolution on March 9, the high court ordered the preventive suspension of Olongapo City Regional Trial Court Branch 73 Judge Norman Pamintuan pending his investigation for allegations of “attempted bribery, inefficiency and engagement in activities that presented conflict of interest.”

Pamintuan cannot enter his court and office until further orders from the court.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pamintuan’s fellow lower court judges in Olongapo City raised the allegations against him during the judicial audit undertaken by the Office of the Court Administrator in January.

FEATURED STORIES

“The High Court directed Judge Pamintuan to comment on the complaints against him, as well as show cause ‘why no disciplinary action should be taken against him for acts which result in conflict of interest on his part,'” read a statement the high court issued on Wednesday.

The court, however, did not give details on Pamintuan’s actions that might constitute conflict of interest.

The court also directed the judge to explain “his failure to decide 16 cases within the mandated period despite his minimal caseload.”

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno has many times underscored the judiciary’s continuing, “necessary but painful cleansing” within its ranks and efforts to “set a gold standard in public service.”

Over recent weeks, the high court has made public its administrative rulings, including decisions on disciplinary cases against lawyers and court employees. SFM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: inefficiency, Judiciary, News, Supreme Court, suspension

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.