Cerbo: Bypassing of PNP chain of command ‘not abnormal occurrence’
PNP spokesperson Chief Superintendent Generoso Cerbo Jr. Photo by Julliane Love de Jesus/INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO
MANILA, Philippines–Bypassing the Philippine National Police chain of command is not an “abnormal occurrence,” the spokesperson of the 150,000-strong organization said Friday.
Still in defense of President Benigno Aquino III’s nonliability in “violating” the PNP chain of command, Chief Superintendent Generoso Cerbo Jr. maintained that all police commanders, as well as the country’s commander in chief, have the right to coordinate directly with anyone of their subordinates.
Citing an example, Cerbo likened Aquino’s authority to that of a police regional director.
“For instance, a Region 3 RD is briefed by a Bulacan police chief about an operation they are launching. Sabihin natin na sinabi ng RD na, maganda ‘yan, ituloy mo. Masasabi ba natin na ito ay violation ng chain of command considering na wala sa meeting ang provincial director?” he said.
In the PNP organizational structure, under the regional director is a provincial director, whose subordinate is the city, town, or municipality police chief.
Article continues after this advertisement“All of us PNP commanders know that. We always have this prerogative to talk directly with our subordinates, bypassing intermediary supervisions,” he said.
Article continues after this advertisement“That’s not abnormal. That really happens.”
During the planning and launch of sensitive mission “Operation Exodus,” Aquino dealt directly with former Special Action Force commander Police Director Getulio Napeñas, bypassing PNP officer in charge Deputy Director General Leonardo Espina.
Exodus was the covert police operation in Mamasapano, Maguindanao, that cost the lives of 44 SAF commandos, 18 Moro Islamic Liberation Front fighters, and five civilians.
This has triggered public outrage while Aquino has been under fire for mishandling the operation.
He stressed that Aquino’s failure to coordinate with Espina is not a violation.
“It’s simply talking directly to your subordinate in that context,” he said.
