Drilon disputes Aquino criminal liability in fatal SAF mission | Inquirer News

Drilon disputes Aquino criminal liability in fatal SAF mission

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 05:42 PM February 02, 2015

Senate President Franklin Drilon. INQUIRER file photo / JOAN BONDOC

Senate President Franklin Drilon. INQUIRER file photo / JOAN BONDOC

MANILA, Philippines—Senate  President  Franklin Drilon came to the defense of President Benigno Aquino III on Monday, saying that the latter could not be “criminally” charged  over the Mamasapano incident  based on the  principle of “command responsibility.”

“I do not agree that President Aquino has incurred any liability on the principle of command responsibility under international law. Under the Rome Statute, a command responsibility would  apply with  the superior, knowing his subordinates will commit a crime, fails to stop the commission of the crime, or who would cover up of them,”  Drilon told reporters.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In this particular case, the Special Action Force of the PNP (Philippine National Police) was there to serve a warrant of arrest, not to commit any crime, so the principle of command responsibility has no application to make President Aquino criminally liable under the Rome Statute. It does not provide any basis for any charges in the International Criminal Court,”  he said.

FEATURED STORIES

The Senate  leader was reacting to Senator Miriam  Defensor-Santiago’s statement that the President may be charged before the International  Criminal  Court  (ICC) over the Mamasapano  incident, citing  the principle of command responsibility.

In an earlier press conference, Santiago said, “Well, anyone who thinks that President Aquino should assume command responsibility as commander in chief of the military and the armed forces of the Philippines, may file a complaint in the International Criminal Court.”

In a separate statement, Santiago said the death  of the  PNP-Special  Action Force (PNP-SAF) men  also “makes the  military commander and other superior officials responsible for war crimes”  under the ICC.

“The  SAF massacre is properly  called a ‘non-international armed conflict.’ We make this distinction, because the relationship of the  Philippine government with  a non-state actor like the MILF is different from the  relationship of our government with other states. The rule is to deny legitimacy to rebels, terrorists, or other armed  groups,” she said.

The death of the 44 SAF members, she said, constituted “atrocities” and therefore, the punitive  laws against war crimes apply.

But Drilon disagreed, saying: “There is no war going on. This is an enforcement of the processes of our laws.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While defending the President, the Senate President branded as “improper” the alleged involvement in the operation of suspended PNP chief Alan Purisima, who was reportedly giving orders to SAF chief Getulio  Napeñas.

“Totally improper. Totally improper for Purisima to give instructions if that is what happened. He is suspended. He should not be doing that,”  he said.

Drilon  said  Purisima’s suspension “clearly calls for him to inhibit himself from official activities. And it is totally improper for him if that is true, if he was giving directions.”

RELATED STORIES

Santiago: President Aquino may be charged before ICC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

‘Aquino as commander-in-chief could have saved 44 SAF men’

TAGS: Mamasapano

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.