Senator Estrada mum on bid of 3 justices to inhibit | Inquirer News

Senator Estrada mum on bid of 3 justices to inhibit

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 12:32 AM December 20, 2014

MANILA, Philippines—He’s keeping the faith.

Detained Sen. Jinggoy Estrada on Friday refused to be dragged down by reports that Malacañang’s supposed attempt to influence the Sandiganbayan justices prompted them to withdraw from trying his plunder and graft cases.


Jinggoy Estrada (2)

Senator Jinggoy Estrada. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

In a statement, Estrada expressed confidence that the members of the antigraft court’s Fifth Division, chaired by Associate Justice Roland Jurado, would decide on his petition for bail based on the evidence presented before them.

“I hope they will not succumb to [the pressure of] outside forces. I still have hope that I will be allowed to post bail,” Estrada said.


The senator also welcomed the decision of the Sandiganbayan en banc to thumb down the request of the Fifth Division justices to back out from the criminal cases brought against him in connection with the P10-billion pork barrel racket.

Along with Jurado, Associate Justices Ma. Theresa Dolores Estoesta and Alexander Gesmundo had asked their colleagues to let them inhibit from Estrada’s case over “personal reasons.”

After a full court session on Wednesday, the 11 justices told their colleagues to stay put and continue handling Estrada’s bail hearing.

“I fervently hope that the case proceeds smoothly without any similar surprises which tend only to prolong the disposition of the case,” Estrada said.

In a related development, the Fifth Division yesterday rebuffed Estrada’s request for a three-day holiday furlough for lack of merit.

In a two-page resolution, the court said the senator’s petition was similar to a motion he had filed asking its approval to allow him to visit the tombs of his deceased relatives last Nov. 1, which it also dismissed.

As a detainee, the court said Estrada should not be allowed to exercise his civil and political rights “just like all other detention prisoners.”


“The inherent and consequent restraint in some of his rights does not run counter to the constitutional presumption of innocence, for the rule stands that until promulgation of final conviction is made, the constitutional mandate of presumption of innocence prevails,” it argued.

The court added: “We agree with the prosecution that to allow (Estrada) to leave his detention cell will not only set a bad precedent, but will likewise be regarded as a mockery of the administration of justice.”

Besides, the court said it would “entail additional and considerable government expenses” to secure Estrada if he was allowed to leave his detention cell at the Philippine National Police Custodial Center.

Estrada, who has been locked up along with Senators Bong Revilla and Juan Ponce Enrile since June, had wanted to spend time with his family on Christmas Day and on New Year’s Eve.


Prosecutors: Evidence strong against Jinggoy Estrada

Jinggoy Estrada warns Binay against appearing in Senate hearing

Jinggoy Estrada: I’m not to blame for case delay

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Associate Justice Roland Jurado, graft cases, Jinggoy Estrada, P10-billion pork barrel, Plunder, Pork barrel, Sandiganbayan, Senator Estrada
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.