‘Bare allegations; no concrete proof’
Just “bare allegations.” No concrete proof.
That’s what the camp of Vice President Jejomar Binay had to say about the accusation of former Makati City Vice Mayor Ernesto Mercado that Binay amassed P4 billion in kickbacks from P15 billion worth of infrastructure projects that the city government awarded to his alleged favored contractor, Hilmarc’s Construction Corp., when he was the mayor.
Mercado told the Inquirer in an interview that Binay got 13 percent of the 28-percent kickback for every project awarded to Hillmarc’s.
Mercado said he got a share and the rest of the kickback went to the 16 members of the city council, two sectoral representatives, the Sangguniang Panglungsod secretary, the department heads, the resident auditors, the members of the bids and awards committee, the members of the technical working group and the city engineer.
He said he and 19 others shared 6 percent of the kickback.
“Other than bare allegations, Mr. Mercado has not produced any concrete proof or evidence that will stand [up] in court,” said Joey Salgado, spokesperson for Binay and head of the Vice President’s press office.
Salgado also observed that Mercado’s statements are inconsistent with his previous claims.
“Previously, he said it was the former city engineer, Nelson Morales, who was the main source of the alleged payoffs. He had claimed to be just a recipient and had no knowledge of the specific amounts allegedly due to other recipients. Now he talks with obvious authority on the breakdown of the supposed payoffs,” Salgado said, referring to Mercado’s testimony in a Senate blue ribbon subcommittee looking into the alleged overpricing of the P2.28-billion Makati City Hall Building II. The building was built by Hilmarc’s.
Same old faces
Documents obtained by the Inquirer showed the members of the city government’s bids and awards committee had not changed since Binay was the mayor, from 2007 to 2010, when his son, Jejomar Erwin “Junjun” Binay Jr., succeeded him.
Salgado explained that the composition of the panel was “always in compliance with the Local Government Code and its implementing rules, specifically Section 3.1 Rule 3.”
The documents showed that the committee abbreviated the bidding process by publishing the invitation to bid in just one Filipino tabloid, Balita, and only for one day, instead of the required 14 days in a newspaper of general circulation, and posted a public announcements involving projects only in the city library, instead of conspicuous places such as elevators and other areas frequented by people.
Apparently, public knowledge of projects was being limited to Hilmarc’s.
That’s not the case, Salgado said.
Seal of good housekeeping
“Makati bid notices are posted in all venues or spaces required under the Government Procurement Act. This also includes the Government Procurement website (Phil-GEPS). Makati is among the few local government[s] that comply with this provision. In fact, this is one basis for the conferment of the seal of good housekeeping from the Department of [the] Interior and Local Government,” Salgado said.
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.