Lawmaker won’t file claim for rights violations | Inquirer News

Lawmaker won’t file claim for rights violations

/ 02:25 AM September 22, 2014

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO, Philippines–Pampanga Rep. Oscar Rodriguez, who was arrested and detained for his involvement in the underground movement during the early years of martial rule, and local newspaper editor Caesar Lacson, who was hunted by the military, are not filing reparation claims as victims of human rights violations.

Rodriguez, a lawyer, said there was “no price for fighting the dictatorship and its repression of civil liberties,” referring to the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos, who imposed martial rule on Sept. 21, 1972.

Known by his aliases “Ka Jasmin” and “Nelson Fabros,” Rodriguez said it was enough that his name be enshrined in the roll of human rights violations victims (HRVVs) under Republic Act No. 10368, or the Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act. President Aquino signed the law in February 2013.

Article continues after this advertisement

Military men arrested Rodriguez in his house in December 1973 and detained him at the Philippine Constabulary headquarters in the provincial capitol here and in Camp Olivas for almost a year. In prison, Rodriguez wrote the petitions of his fellow inmates.

FEATURED STORIES

A classmate, former Deputy Director General Ramsey Ocampo of the Philippine National Police, and lawyer Zoilo Andin, husband of his former teacher, helped secure his release.

The name of Lacson, a youth organizer who wrote antigovernment articles, was stricken off the list of military targets through the intervention of San Fernando Archbishop Emeritus Paciano Aniceto.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lacson, editor of Punto Central Luzon, finds the process of seeking reparation tedious and the documentary requirements too many as the November deadline for claims nears. Like Rodriguez, he prefers recognition to compensation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Isagani Serrano, a former detainee, has described RA 10368 as a “landmark legislation” because it formally recognizes the use of torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, warrantless arrests, forced disappearances and other forms of curtailing free will during martial rule.

Article continues after this advertisement

The monetary and nonmonetary assistance assured by the law could help HRVVs and their families move on, its proponents said. The law covers the period from Sept. 21, 1972, to Feb. 25, 1986, when the Edsa People Power Revolution ousted Marcos.

“The State hereby acknowledges its moral and legal obligation to recognize and/or provide reparation to said victims and/or their families for the deaths, injuries, sufferings, deprivations and damages they suffered under the Marcos regime,” the law states.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Similarly, it is the obligation of the State to acknowledge the sufferings and damage inflicted upon persons whose properties or businesses were forcibly taken over, sequestered or used, or those whose professions were damaged and/or impaired, or those whose freedom of movement was restricted and/or such other victims of the violations of the Bill of Rights.”–Tonette Orejas, Inquirer Central Luzon

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Human rights, Marcos, Martial law, Military, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.