Groups oppose garbage incineration | Inquirer News

Groups oppose garbage incineration

/ 07:35 PM August 12, 2014

BOUNTY OF THE BAY. Scavengers scour the heap of garbage washed ashore the Manila Bay in Roxas Boulevard Manila. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

BOUNTY OF THE BAY. Scavengers scour the heap of garbage washed ashore the Manila Bay in Roxas Boulevard Manila. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Environmentalists trooped Tuesday to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, warning the agency of a law suit if it pursues plans to allow the burning of garbage as a means to manage solid waste.

They claimed that the National Solid Waste Management Commission, which is under the DENR, would be violating the very law that created it, which is the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act or Republic Act 9003, as well as the Clean Air Act or Republic Act 8749.

Article continues after this advertisement

Some 100 zero waste advocates, including members of the EcoWaste Coalition, the Cavite Green Coalition, the Freedom from Debt Coalition, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, Greenpeace Southeast Asia, Health Care Without Harm, the Lasallian Community Development Center, Miriam PEACE, Mother Earth Foundation, November 17 Movement, Philippine Earth Justice Center, and the Zero Waste Philippines, served a demand letter for the DENR and the waste management commission  to stop drafting guidelines for waste-to-energy burn technologies.

FEATURED STORIES

The groups made the demand while the commission held a meeting Tuesday at the DENR main office in Quezon City.

In their letter to Environment Secretary Ramon Paje, who chairs the waste management commission, the groups said, “We write to convey to you our strong objections to the proposed guidelines on waste-to-energy technologies that the NSWMC is planning to develop as evidenced by its proposed resolution creating a multi-agency sub-group.”

Article continues after this advertisement

They alleged that creating the sub-group was tantamount to allowing all forms of waste-to-energy technologies, including incineration, in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Without limiting the guidelines that the multi-agency sub-group will be tasked to create to non-burn or non-incineration waste-to-energy options only, we are afraid that this direction represents a clear attempt to undermine the intent of both the Clean Air Act and the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act,” they said, stressing that waste incineration is prohibited by both laws.

Article continues after this advertisement

“While resource recovery is allowed under the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, such options should not include incineration… We would like to emphasize that the failure to implement RA 9003 should not be used as an excuse by the DENR, the NSWMC and by LGUs—the very agencies mandated to implement the law—to resort to the use of waste incinerators disguised as waste-to-energy facilities,” the groups’ statement said.

The groups said that the inability of the government agencies to enforce the law “would already warrant the filing of legal cases against erring and irresponsible agencies.”

Article continues after this advertisement

They added, “The government’s failure to comply with the provisions of the above-mentioned laws (Republic Acts 9003 and 8749) will leave us with no other option but to resort to taking the necessary legal remedies.”

The demand letter was signed by EcoWaste’s Von Hernandez and Sonia Mendoza; the NSWMC’s non-government organization representative Romeo Hidalgo; Cavite Green Coalition coordinator Eloisa Tolentino; Ofelia Panganiban of Zero Waste Philippines; and Health Care Without Harm executive director Merci Ferrer.

“We are not against resource recovery, including the generation of energy from wastes… In fact, we promote resource recovery, but it should not employ incineration,” Mendoza, who also chairs the Mother Earth Foundation, said in a statement citing anaerobic digestion as an example of resource recovery where methane from decomposing biodegradable waste is collected as energy.

“Pyrolysis, gasification, plasma arc, cement kilns, and other waste incineration technologies are what we vehemently oppose since they inevitably release toxic substances to the environment posing serious health and environmental hazards, destroy finite resources, and kill our thriving recycling industry,“ Mendoza said.

EcoWaste national coordinator Aileen Lucero said, “If wastes are dealt with according to the law, only a mere 2 percent to 4 percent of generated wastes would be available for incinerators to burn, which makes waste-to-energy incineration highly unworkable.”

She further added, “The NSWMC cannot afford to violate the very law that created it, rather, it should focus all its energies on upholding the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act.”

The waste management commission or NSWMC is the agency tasked to implement Republic Act 9003, which calls for the creation of a national program to manage the control, transfer, transport, processing and disposal of solid waste. The commission drafts policies to enforce the act and oversees the implementation of solid waste management plans by local government units.

RELATED STORIES


Metro Manila produces a fourth of Philippine garbage

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Zero-waste coalition hits dumping of garbage on PH

TAGS: DENR, Garbage, Incineration, solid waste

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.