Budget flexibility not impaired by DAP ruling, says ex-treasurer
Former National Treasurer Leonor Briones, head of the budget watchdog Social Watch Philippines. PHOTO from Facebook account
MANILA—With the leeway already provided by law, President Aquino should not lose budget flexibility even after the Supreme Court ruling striking down the Disbursement Acceleration Program, according to former National Treasurer Leonor Briones.
The Office of the President has control over the Special Purpose Fund, which amounts to P282 billion in the 2014 national budget, Briones said at a forum on the DAP at the UP National College of Public Administration and Governance in Quezon City on Thursday.
“That’s 20 percent of the budget. Flexibility is not an excuse [for implementing the DAP],” said Briones, professor emeritus of public administration at UP.
P282 billion is actually only 10.8 percent of the P2.6-trillion budget.
Briones said half of the P2.6-trillion budget had no details.
Article continues after this advertisement“The President can move around and augment the budget within his office. But cross-border transfer is a violation of the Constitution,” she said.
Article continues after this advertisementAside from its P2.79-billion budget, the Office of the President also gets the direct remittances from the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor), Briones said.
Instead of the DAP, Briones said, the government could have used existing items in the budget, such as debt-servicing, which she called a cover for extra money.
President Aquino said the Supreme Court decision had removed the government’s flexibility to act effectively in response to changing market conditions.
The ruling would also undo the socioeconomic progress achieved through the DAP, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad said at Senate finance committee hearing on the DAP on Thursday.
Abad is the architect of the DAP, which the government said was as an economic stimulus program.
“If the budget was crafted correctly in the first place, it would stimulate the economy,” said UP law professor Harry Roque, another panelist at the forum.
Greco Belgica, one of the petitioners who challenged the legality of the DAP in the Supreme Court, shared Roque’s statement.
If needed, the President could go to Congress for supplemental budgets, Roque said.
He cited the P14.5-billion supplemental budget for the rehabilitation of areas hit by Supertyphoon Yolanda that took Congress only two weeks to pass.
RELATED STORIES
House deliberates on proposed P2.3Tr national budget
