Palace ready to accept adverse decision from SC | Inquirer News

Palace ready to accept adverse decision from SC

/ 05:22 PM July 21, 2014

Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines – Malacañang on Monday said it would be ready to accept the decision of the Supreme Court on its motion for reconsideration on the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), be it favorable or adverse.

“We have accepted a number of decisions that were adverse to us,” Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said in a televised press briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said among these was the high court’s decision to abolish the Philippine Truth Commission, which was created by Executive Order no. 1 in 2010, for singling out the administration of former president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

FEATURED STORIES

“A number of decisions have been adverse to us so we have always respected the decision of the Supreme Court,” Lacierda said.

He said the filing of the MR itself meant that Malacañang respected the judicial process and institution.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are a government of laws not of men. They have the mandate to decide what the law is and for that particular reason, we have chosen to avail of the remedy of filing a motion for reconsideration that implicitly and explicitly acknowledges that we respect the processes and the institutions,” the spokesperson said.

Article continues after this advertisement

President Benigno Aquino III himself said that people had cautioned him against assailing the Supreme Court decision, especially since it was unanimous against DAP with only one justice abstaining.

Article continues after this advertisement

At that time he said, “We had also been warned that pushing through with this motion might put us in greater danger. My message to the Supreme Court: We do not want two equal branches of government to go head to head, needing a third branch to step in to intervene.”

His spokespersons, however, downplayed the comment, saying Aquino meant no disrespect.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lacierda insisted that the DAP was implemented in good faith and had benefited the Filipino people.

RELATED STORIES

Aquino vs Judiciary?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Escudero, Poe on Aquino’s defense of DAP: The law is the law

TAGS: Nation, News, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.