Prosecutors reinforce case vs Enrile | Inquirer News

Prosecutors reinforce case vs Enrile

/ 03:57 PM June 26, 2014

Juan Ponce Enrile

Senator Juan Ponce Enrile.  INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Despite the dismissal of the Office of the Special Prosecutor’s bid to amend the plunder case against Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr., it again moved to amend the charge sheet or information for plunder against Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in connection with the pork barrel scam.

In the memorandum submitted Thursday, the Special Prosecutor said that while the information filed is sufficient in form and substance, they deemed it “wise” to amend it to lessen the objections being raised by the defense.

Article continues after this advertisement

They asked the anti-graft court to mention that the senator was “the one who amassed, accumulated and acquired ill-gotten wealth in connivance or in conspiracy with his co-accused public officer and private individuals.”

FEATURED STORIES

The government prosecutors also asked to include the phrases “collecting directly or indirectly,” and “and/or anomalous” as well as the words “percentage” and “collected.”

During Thursday afternoon’s hearing, the Sandiganbayan Third Division where Enrile’s case is pending also heard the other motions for judicial determination filed by Enrile’s co-accused.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Third Division has yet to issue an arrest warrant against the Senator and his co-accused.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Article continues after this advertisement

Enrile: Too old to jail?

Enrile may be held in hospital

Article continues after this advertisement

2 PNP hospital wards await Enrile if…

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Nation, News, plunder case

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.