No stopping RH law once SC ruling is promulgated | Inquirer News

No stopping RH law once SC ruling is promulgated

/ 01:04 PM April 09, 2014

PURPLE TEAM FOR RH LAW. Supporters of the reproductive health (RH) law stage a candle vigil at a compound in Baguio City on Monday where Supreme Court justices are expected to deliberate on whether to lift the suspension of the controversial RH law. EV ESPIRITU/INQUIRER NORTHERN LUZON

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines–The order stopping the implementation of Republic Act 10354 or the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 will be lifted once the Supreme Court’s decision has been promulgated.

On March 18, 2013, the high court issued a status quo ante order (SQAO) against the implementation of the RH law after Pro-Life Philippines Foundation Inc. and Catholic Church groups questioned the law for violating constitutional provisions guaranteeing the right to life.

Article continues after this advertisement

Before the four months was over, the Supreme Court extended indefinitely its status quo ante order last July.

FEATURED STORIES

During the high court’s annual summer session in Baguio, it ruled that several of its provisions as well as some provisions of its implementing rules and regulations are unconstitutional and the law per se is not unconstitutional.

High Court source said the SQAO is effectively lifted once the decision is promulgated.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The SQAO no longer has any force or authority for those (provisions of the law) not struck down,” the source said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Only eight provisions under the law and its implementing rules and regulations were declared unconstitutional by the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

SC: RH law constitutional

Article continues after this advertisement

SC extends RH law TRO indefinitely

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: RH law, Supreme Court, TRO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.