No stopping RH law once SC ruling is promulgated

/ 01:04 PM April 09, 2014

PURPLE TEAM FOR RH LAW. Supporters of the reproductive health (RH) law stage a candle vigil at a compound in Baguio City on Monday where Supreme Court justices are expected to deliberate on whether to lift the suspension of the controversial RH law. EV ESPIRITU/INQUIRER NORTHERN LUZON

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines–The order stopping the implementation of Republic Act 10354 or the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 will be lifted once the Supreme Court’s decision has been promulgated.

On March 18, 2013, the high court issued a status quo ante order (SQAO) against the implementation of the RH law after Pro-Life Philippines Foundation Inc. and Catholic Church groups questioned the law for violating constitutional provisions guaranteeing the right to life.


Before the four months was over, the Supreme Court extended indefinitely its status quo ante order last July.

During the high court’s annual summer session in Baguio, it ruled that several of its provisions as well as some provisions of its implementing rules and regulations are unconstitutional and the law per se is not unconstitutional.


High Court source said the SQAO is effectively lifted once the decision is promulgated.

“The SQAO no longer has any force or authority for those (provisions of the law) not struck down,” the source said.

Only eight provisions under the law and its implementing rules and regulations were declared unconstitutional by the high court.


SC: RH law constitutional

SC extends RH law TRO indefinitely

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: reproductive health, responsible parenting, RH law, status quo ante order, Supreme Court, TRO
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.