No state witness immunities for Tuason, Cunanan - Assistant Ombudsman | Inquirer News

No state witness immunities for Tuason, Cunanan – Assistant Ombudsman

/ 06:37 PM April 01, 2014

Ruby Tuason INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–Ruby Tuason and Dennis Cunanan would not be given the state witness immunities unless the Ombudsman frees them from criminal liabilities in the plunder and graft charges they are facing.

Assistant Ombudsman Asryman Rafanan said in a press briefing Tuesday that ‎there is still no green light from Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales if Tuason and Cunanan would be entitled to immunities from any suit while they testify on the billions-worth pork barrel scam.

Article continues after this advertisement

Earlier, the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee has left the decision to the Office of the Ombudsman on whether it would grant the two witnesses immunities from suits.

FEATURED STORIES

Tuason is currently a provisional state witness while Cunanan’s status is still pending.

“The Ombudsman should resolve first the question‎ as to the liability of Ms. Tuason and the rest of the respondents before studying or considering their request for immunity,” Rafanan said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that the Ombudsman has yet to determine the extent of Tuason and Cunanan’s criminal liabilities in their cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dennis Cunanan INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Earlier Tuesday, the anti-corruption agency said it found probable cause to file plunder and graft charges against Senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. and alleged pork scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tuason and Cunanan were among those government officials who will be indicted for graft and plunder charges.

Tuason, a former Malacañang social secretary, implicated Estrada and Enrile and Jessica Lucila “Gigi” Reyes, Enrile’s aide,  in the pork barrel scam.

Article continues after this advertisement

“(Also), there would be no need for immunity if (they) wouldn’t be found liable,” he said.

Unlike Tuason who filed a formal request for immunity, Rafanan said Cunanan has not filed an appeal for immunity yet.

“If there had been informal request by Cunanan, it could be under traced for his submitted counter affidavit,” he said.

“If those requests, formal or informal, would be considered, ‎it will be studied jointly with that of Tuazon,” he added.

Cunanan is the outgoing head of the Technology Resource Center who testified before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee against the channeling of PDAF by some lawmakers and government officials.

RELATED STORIES

Ethics probe on Enrile, Estrada, Revilla pushed

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Drilon urges speedy trial of ‘pork’ scam suspects

TAGS: Conchita Carpio-Morales, PDAF, Pork barrel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.