Lawyer of ex-PNP chief Razon backs out of his cases | Inquirer News

Lawyer of ex-PNP chief Razon backs out of his cases

By: - Reporter / @cynchdbINQ
/ 07:49 AM January 13, 2014

Former PNP Director General Avelino Razon Jr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The lead counsel of former Philippine National Police Director General Avelino Razon Jr. in his graft and malversation cases has withdrawn for “ethical reasons.”

In a manifestation and withdrawal of appearance, lawyer Maria Nympha Mandagan informed the Sandiganbayan antigraft court’s Fourth Division of the termination of her legal services and asked that she be relieved of the duties and responsibilities as counsel of Razon.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mandagan said that Razon, whose petition for bail has not been acted upon by the court, had agreed to be represented by the law office of Poblador Bautista and Reyes. Lawyer Anzen Dee of the law firm will prepare a strategy for Razon’s defense.

FEATURED STORIES

Razon has posted bail and pleaded not guilty to four counts of graft, but is still being detained for malversation in connection with the alleged bogus repair and maintenance of 28 police armored vehicles to the tune of P358.58 million in 2007 and 2008.

There are 32 other former top PNP officials and private individuals accused in the cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

Razon and his coaccused complained to the court that the prosecution was causing an “inordinate delay” in the bail hearing by presenting a long list of witnesses and documents, some of which were not even relevant to the petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

They noted that the prosecution had so far presented only five of the 71 witnesses it had listed.

Article continues after this advertisement

The accused further said that a delay in the proceedings would not only give rise to a denial of justice to them but would also work undue vexation and oppression upon them and others involved, from the government to the offended private parties.

In their counter-manifestation, the prosecutors said they were aware of the constitutional provision that states that before conviction, all persons shall be allowed to post bail, except those charged with offenses punishable by life imprisonment or more and when the evidence of guilt is strong.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: malversation, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.