New DoT chief appointment 'questionable', De Lima tells Senate | Inquirer News

New DoT chief appointment ‘questionable’, De Lima tells Senate

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 11:42 AM September 06, 2011

MANILA, Philippines — No less than Justice Secretary Leila de Lima acknowledged on Tuesday that the assumption into office of Ramon Jimenez as tourism secretary was “objectionable” and “questionable.”

De Lima admitted this Tuesday during the budget deliberations of the Senate finance committee where Senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson questioned the legality of Jimenez’s taking over the Department of Tourism because he has yet to be appointed by Malacanang in an acting capacity.

Lacson said that Jimenez assumed office when he attended the flag-raising ceremony Monday at the DoT.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Lima said the legality of Jimenez taking over was defensible if he was appointed in an acting capacity.

FEATURED STORIES

“If he is in an acting capacity, designated in an acting capacity , yes I think it would be defensible, the legality of that assumption would be defensible . Otherwise, it’s really after an oath of office because an oath office would complete the process,” she said.

“It’s indeed an oath of office so he may not be in an acting capacity,” said Lacson.

Article continues after this advertisement

“My point is , I think the Secretary of Justice should advise Mr. Ramon Jimenez to get out of that DoT compound fast before he starts signing documents,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lacson said Jimenez was still considered a nominee because he could not be issued an ad interim appointment because Congress was in session.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I didn’t hear the President [Benigno Aquino III] or Malacanang announce his appointment in an acting capacity. In fact, he was designated as the Secretary of Tourism so before he commits or becomes liable for usurpation of authority, I think you should advise him to get out of that compound and wait for his confirmation,” the senator added.

De Lima agreed that there was no clarification that Jimenez was in an acting capacity therefore he should be subject to the general rule. Now they may try to justify that, this argument so that there would be no hiatus but legally speaking or strictly speaking there’s something objectionable, is in fact questionable,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Senator Franklin Drilon pointed out that under the Administrative Code, an acting designation can only be issued to somebody who’s already in government.

And based on past practices, Drilon said a prospective department head was appointed presidential adviser first before he or she could be appointed in an acting capacity.

And when Congress adjourns its sessions, then an ad interim appointment can now be issued so the nominee could go through the confirmation process of the Commission on Appointments.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“In the meantime, he performs his functions in an acting capacity and his designation is not yet submitted to the CA [Commission on Appointments] since he’s only in an acting capacity,” Drilon added.

TAGS: Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.