Close to 94% say SSS hefty bonuses ‘immoral’ | Inquirer News
INQUIRER.net POLL

Close to 94% say SSS hefty bonuses ‘immoral’

/ 11:55 AM November 07, 2013

MANILA, Philippines—INQUIRER.net readers do not agree with the Social Security System (SSS) chief, who believes that the granting of huge bonuses to its members was “moral.”

About 94 percent disagreed to the INQUIRER.net poll question, “The president and CEO of SSS believes giving hefty bonuses to its board members is moral. Do you agree?”

Article continues after this advertisement

In an earlier report, Emilio de Quiros Jr., SSS president and chief executive officer, said he believed the granting of hefty bonuses to board members of the state insurance agency was moral.

FEATURED STORIES

From the 14,905 votes generated until Thursday, 13,951 answered “No” or 93.6 percent.

Only 6.4 percent of the votes, which totaled to 954, believed that the granting of hefty bonuses is moral.

Article continues after this advertisement

The eight members of the SSS board got a performance bonus of about P1 million each for 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

The bonuses were given in accordance with the performance-incentives system set by the Governance Commission for Government-owned and -controlled corporations (GCG), which operates under the Office of the President.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

SSS head calls grant of P1M bonus to each executive ‘moral’

Not only SSS but 19 other state firms gave bonuses

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Emilio de Quiros, poll, results

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.