Accused in car dealer’s murder wants to be state witness | Inquirer News

Accused in car dealer’s murder wants to be state witness

/ 04:30 AM March 09, 2011

AN ALLEGED member of the Dominguez carjack gang who had also been linked to the murder of a car dealer has sought the permission of the court to allow him be a state witness.

Saying he was not “the most guilty” among the others accused of the murder, Alfred Mendiola is now asking the court to remove him from the list of the accused.

Judge Ma. Luisa Q. Padilla of Regional Trial Court Branch 215, however, said she has not yet received the pleading filed March 3.

Article continues after this advertisement

The scheduled arraignment Tuesday of Raymond Dominguez, one of the alleged masterminds in the murder of car dealer Venson Evangelista in January, did not push through.

FEATURED STORIES

Padilla opted to reset the arraignment to March 22 since three motions on the case are still awaiting resolution in court.

“The arraignment will be reset to another date so all of the accused will be arraigned at the same time,” the judge said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Brothers Roger and Raymond Dominguez were present during the hearing, together with their coaccused, Jason Miranda. Mendiola and Ferdinand Parulan, who are also on the list of accused were not present despite being served a subpoena.

Article continues after this advertisement

The accused are facing car theft with homicide charges for the death of Evangelista who was abducted on Jan. 13 and whose body was later found in Cabanatuan City.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court will also resolve Raymond’s request to be transferred to the Bulacan provincial jail and both Mendiola and Parulan’s motion for a reinvestigation.

In his motion, Mendiola said the Department of Justice’s Witness Protection Program had “provisionally admitted” him as state witness for a 90-day period, with a reevaluation after.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It must be emphasized that it was Mendiola’s testimony that clinched the filing of the case against the principals. Without the testimony, no other direct evidence was available for the prosecution to prove the elements of the crime,” the motion read.

“Since my client was not individually responsible for the crime charged except by reason of conspiracy, it cannot be said then that Mendiola appears to be the most guilty,” said Mendiola’s lawyer Willie Rivera.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Car theft, Crime

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.