Lawmakers insist on right to pick projects | Inquirer News

Lawmakers insist on right to pick projects

/ 03:04 AM September 09, 2013

Eastern Samar Rep. Ben Evardone: We will limit the menu to projects less prone to corruptionr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—With the impending removal of the P25-billion lump sum pork barrel allocation from the national budget, the House of Representatives’ appropriations committee is mulling over a proposal to allow lawmakers to take charge of identifying over the limited infrastructure projects that would be provided for in the 2014 General Appropriations Act, according to Eastern Samar Rep. Ben Evardone.

Evardone, who is also vice chair of the appropriations committee, said that under the proposal, the infrastructure projects identified by the lawmakers would be included in the budget of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH).

Article continues after this advertisement

The House is planning to scrap the lawmakers’ P25-billion lump sum appropriation for the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and distribute the amount to several executive agencies that would provide social services. The DPWH may also get a portion of the funds for infrastructure projects.

FEATURED STORIES

But if the proposal is approved, the kind of infrastructure projects lawmakers could push would be severely limited, said Evardone.

“We will limit the menu to projects less prone to corruption, such as the concreting of roads and multipurpose buildings. We won’t allow the graveling of roads or dredging projects,” he said in a phone interview.

Article continues after this advertisement

Evardone also said that the lawmakers would have to work fast to consult their constituents and identify the infrastructure projects because these have to be included in the 2014 national budget before it is passed on second reading.

Article continues after this advertisement

“What is important is that the projects are based on the priorities of the community based on consultations with local governments and people’s organizations,” he said in a separate text message.

Article continues after this advertisement

Those who fail to identify infrastructure projects in time would lose their chance to have these specifically provided for under the 2014 budget, he added.

Evardone said that under this scheme, the infrastructure projects would be more transparent and easy to monitor because they would be reflected in the budget. Lawmakers would also have less discretion in the utilization of the funds, he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Infrastructure or “hard” projects are among the items funded by the lawmakers’ pork barrel. The other items consist of “soft” projects such as medical and educational assistance.

With the removal of the lump sum pork barrel, lawmakers would have to refer those seeking medical and educational assistance to the executive agencies that provide social services.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The move to remove the lump sum PDAF came in the wake of public outrage generated by reports that the pork barrel has been used to line private pockets.

TAGS: Ben Evardone, Congress

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.