Ako Bicol says it’s willing to lead legal battle | Inquirer News

Ako Bicol says it’s willing to lead legal battle

By: - Correspondent / @msarguellesINQ
/ 12:54 AM November 09, 2012

LEGAZPI CITY—The Ako Bicol (AKB) is willing to lead a united front with other party-list groups in asking the Supreme Court to nullify the decision of the Commission on Election (Comelec) that disqualified them from taking part in the 2013 national and local elections.

AKB Representatives Rodel Batocabe and Alfredo Garbin told the Inquirer on Thursday that although AKB and other disqualified party-list groups filed individual petitions at the high tribunal, they could unite as they have common grounds to decry what AKB said was the arbitrary decision of the Comelec.

In a statement quoting him, ex-Comelec chairman Christian Monsod said the Constitution contains no prohibition preventing the rich from serving in party-list groups.

Article continues after this advertisement

Monsod, a member of the commission that wrote the 1987 Constitution, said there is a need to amend the Party-List System Act to correct the flawed interpretation of the constitutional provision on the party-list system.

FEATURED STORIES

He said even the law itself does not contain a provision that sets a wealth standard for nominees of party-list groups.

“Reforms are indeed needed to correct the flawed interpretation of the constitutional provisions on the party-list system,” Monsod was quoted as saying.

Article continues after this advertisement

The two AKB lawmakers said they are willing to take the lead to initiate a common petition in questioning the Comelec decision to remove them from the list of qualified party list organizations.

Article continues after this advertisement

Batocabe said it is the contention of AKB that the Comelec acted with grave abuse of discretion and violated the Constitution by not resolving the matter first in the division level.

Article continues after this advertisement

Garbin, in a text message, said some delisted party-list groups acted individually in their petitions at the Supreme Court because “each party list group has different grounds.”

“We have similar issues especially on two questionable aspects of the Comelec decision—the right to vote of our constituents and the absence parameters in reviewing party-list qualifications,” said Batocabe.

Article continues after this advertisement

Batocabe said he welcomed the opinion of Monsod who said AKB has valid and strong arguments to fight the Comelec decision at the Supreme Court.

When asked if Ako Bicol, which won three seats in the House, should be barred from running for being represented by the rich, Monsod replied: “Under the present system, (AKB) has good and valid arguments presented before the Supreme Court.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Ako Bicol, court, Election, Party list, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.