Robbery case versus Joavan dismissed | Inquirer News

Robbery case versus Joavan dismissed

/ 07:17 PM July 25, 2011

The court dismissed the robbery charges filed against Joavan Fernandez after two prosecution witnesses failed to attend a couple of hearings.

In an order dated July 20, Regional Trial Court Judge Gilbert Moises of Branch 18 granted the request of defense lawyer George Bragat to junk the case, invoking the constitutional right of the accused for “speedy trial.”

When the case was called last week, prosecution witnesses Felix Pardillo and Darwin Homicillo didn’t appear in court.

Article continues after this advertisement

Prosecutor William Canta explained to the court that he exerted “earnest effort” but failed to locate the witnesses.

FEATURED STORIES

The defense counsel earlier moved to dismiss the charges after the complainant Raymund Paran executed an affidavit of desistance.

Although Paran opted to back off from the case against Joavan, the judge opted to go on hearing the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

The judge, however, ruled to dismiss the case since prosecution witnesses are not appearing during trials.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last Dec. 15, Joavan allegedly fired a gun at Paran after he refused to pay for two bottles of Coke Litro in the cooperative store in Vista Grande Subdivision, Talisay City.

Article continues after this advertisement

Paran told police that Joavan dropped by on board a red Kia Sportage and indicated that he wanted to buy Coke.

Paran claimed that the mayor’s son didn’t pay for the two Coke bottles that he gave him but pointed a gun at the attendant saying, “Unsa man ka, pamasaker ka (Do you want to be massacred)?”

Article continues after this advertisement

Paran said a shot was fired near him, catching him by surprise. He said he was scared that he allowed Joavan to leave without paying for the two bottles of Coke Litro.

Paran, however, executed an affidavit of desistance to withdraw the charges against Joavan after they claimed to have amicably settled the issues./REPORTER ADOR VINCENT S. MAYOL

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Judiciary, robbery

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.