Japan sees new Chinese actions near disputed isles | Inquirer News

Japan sees new Chinese actions near disputed isles

/ 12:33 PM October 25, 2012

A Japan Coast Guard’s patrol boat, third from the top, and a Taiwanese patrol boat, 4th from the top, discharge water each other near disputed islands called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, in the East China Sea, Tuesday, September 25, 2012. On Tuesday morning, about 50 Taiwanese fishing boats accompanied by 10 Taiwanese surveillance ships came within almost 20 kilometers (about 12 miles) of the disputed islands – within what Japan considers to be its territorial waters, said Yasuhiko Oku, an official with the Japanese coast guard. AP/Kyodo News

TOKYO — Chinese ships entered waters near a group of disputed islands for the first time in three weeks Thursday, prompting a strong protest from Japan, which says China’s air force has also sharply increased its operations in the area.

Japan’s Coast Guard said the four Chinese surveillance ships were spotted within a 22-kilometer (12-nautical mile) zone that Tokyo considers its territorial waters near one of the disputed islands in the East China Sea early Thursday morning.

Article continues after this advertisement

The ships refused to leave, saying the area was Chinese territory, according to Atsushi Takahashi, a spokesman for the Coast Guard’s headquarters in Okinawa, which has jurisdiction over the islands. He said it was the first time Chinese ships had entered the territorial waters since Oct. 3.

FEATURED STORIES

Japan’s Foreign Ministry lodged a strong protest with China’s ambassador in Tokyo.

The naval activity near the uninhabited islands called the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu in China comes after officials from Japan and China held talks last week in Shanghai to discuss the dispute. The dispute has heightened tensions between the nations in recent months.

Article continues after this advertisement

Chinese ships have been frequenting waters near the islands, also claimed by Taiwan, since Japan’s government nationalized them last month, a decision that sparked violent demonstrations across China. The ships have generally kept out of the 22-kilometer zone, however.

Article continues after this advertisement

Japanese air force officials, meanwhile, say there has also been a spike recently in Chinese air operations resulting in emergency “scrambles” by Japanese fighter jets to keep them from entering Japan’s airspace.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to statistics released by the Defense Ministry, fighters were dispatched 54 times between July and September in response to possible incursions of Japanese airspace by Chinese warplanes. That was up sharply from the three previous months, before the tensions heightened, when there were 15 such scrambles.

A ministry official said virtually all of the incidents were in airspace over the East China Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

Both countries have been flexing their military muscles to bolster their claims to the islands, which are strategically located and surrounded by rich fishing grounds, along with potentially lucrative reserves of undersea natural resources.

Last week, China held exercises involving 11 vessels from its East China Sea fleet and the civilian marine surveillance and fishery administration agencies, along with eight aircraft, state media said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

While the exact location of the exercises wasn’t known, state TV showed the vessels and aircraft operating near shore, not on the high seas or close to the disputed islands.

TAGS: China, disputed islands, Japan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.