DOJ recommends plunder raps vs Estrada – Ombudsman
ALLEGED LINK TO FLOOD CONTROL MESS

DOJ recommends plunder raps vs Estrada – Ombudsman

/ 05:50 AM May 19, 2026
Junggoy Estrada
Sen. Jinggoy Estrada —File photo by Niño Jesus Orbeta | INQUIRER

MANILA, Philippines — The Office of the Ombudsman on Monday said the Department of Justice (DOJ) had recommended the filing of cases, including plunder, graft, and bribery, against Sen. Jinggoy Estrada and other former Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) officials in connection with flood control project anomalies.

Assistant Ombudsman Mico Clavano said the recommendation was contained in the resolution of the DOJ’s National Prosecution Service with Docket No. XVI-INV-26A-00003, stemming from a comprehensive preliminary investigation triggered by the criminal complaint lodged by the National Bureau of Investigation-Department of Justice (NBI-DOJ) Public Works and Bid-Rigging Task Force.

“Following months of evaluation, the submission of counteraffidavits, and extensive evidence-gathering, the DOJ Panel concluded that there is an interconnected network of public officers who abused their official designations to manipulate project specifications, clear budgets, and rig public bidding workflows,” Clavano said in a press conference.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Estrada, Revilla face plunder raps over flood control mess — DOJ

FEATURED STORIES

“The primary respondents named in the resolution of the DOJ include Senator [Estrada],” he added.

In September 2025, Estrada, through his spokesperson, said he remained confident that no evidence exists linking him to any supposed “kickbacks” in flood control projects.

READ: Jinggoy Estrada perjury charges vs Brice Hernandez dismissed

Exhaustive evidence

According to Clavano, the DOJ’s preliminary investigation was able to accumulate exhaustive evidence, including legislative records, position description forms, and sworn transcripts from the Senate blue ribbon committee hearings held in November last year.

Article continues after this advertisement

In separate Senate hearings, former DPWH assistant district engineer Brice Hernandez alleged that Estrada and Sen. Joel Villanueva maneuvered to allocate P355 million and P600 million, respectively, to Bulacan’s first district in exchange for a 30-percent cut in the funding.

Clavano said that, aside from Estrada, the resolution also named the following as primary respondents:

Article continues after this advertisement
  • former Public Works Secretary Manuel Bonoan
  • the late former DPWH Undersecretary Maria Catalina Cabral
  • former DPWH Undersecretary Roberto Bernardo
  • former DPWH Metro Manila regional director Gerard Opulencia
  • DPWH district engineer Henry Alcantara
  • Bong Dinglasan and Denryl Caesar Cortuna, DPWH assistant district engineers in North Manila
  • DPWH district engineer Manny Bulusan
  • a certain Arturo Gonzales Jr.
  • several unidentified people

Aside from plunder under Republic Act No. 7080, the respondents were recommended to be charged for violation of Section 3(b) and Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Direct Bribery and Receiving Gifts by Public Officers under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code, and Corruption of Public Officials under Article 212 of the Revised Penal Code.

Dropped charges

However, the DOJ recommended the formal dropping of charges against Cabral after her death last year.

Criminal charges were likewise recommended to be dropped against Bernardo, Opulencia, and Alcantara, who are all under the DOJ’s Witness Protection Program.

Clavano said the Office of the Ombudsman will conduct its own independent review of the merits of the DOJ’s findings, leading to the possible filing of cases before the Sandiganbayan if warranted.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The second interim report of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure released in October 2025 also asked the Office of the Ombudsman to consider filing plunder charges against Estrada and Villanueva; Bernardo; former Ako Bicol Rep. Elizaldy “Zaldy” Co; former Caloocan Rep. Mary Mitzi Cajayon-Uy; and Commission on Audit Commissioner Mario Lipana, for their alleged “participat[ion] in a scheme which they took profit of [involving] massively large amounts of the people’s money.” —With a report from Inquirer Research

TAGS: DoJ, Jinggoy Estrada, Ombudsman, plunder case

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2026 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved