Iloilo folk to pay more for power from coal | Inquirer News

Iloilo folk to pay more for power from coal

/ 09:32 PM June 20, 2012

ILOILO CITY—The people of this city will pay more for electricity after the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) allowed a coal plant operator here to collect an additional 32 centavos per kilowatt hour to recover investments and operating costs.

In a 23-page order issued on Dec. 26, 2011, ERC granted two petitions—Sept. 14 and 20, 2011—of Panay Energy Development Corp. (PEDC) to adjust rates to recover investments and operating costs.

PEDC operates the $104-million 164-megawatt coal-fired power plant in La Paz district here. The coal plant supplies most of the electricity that Panay Electric Co. (Peco) distributes to at least 53,000 households, commercial establishments and offices in the city.

Article continues after this advertisement

In its Dec. 26, 2011, order, ERC authorized PEDC to collect at least P692 million in additional charges in a five-year period.

FEATURED STORIES

Gil Altamira, the commercial operations manager of Global Business Power Corp., the firm that operates PEDC, said the ERC order would help PEDC recover expenses on testing and commissioning operations conducted from April to August last year. “This is not an increase,” Altamira said.

Engineer Randy Pastolero, the Peco vice president for operations, said as a result of the ERC order, electricity rates in the city would increase from P12.13 to P12.45 per kWh (residential use) and from P11.60 to P11.92 per kWh (commercial use).

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is not an increase of our rates. We merely collect what is charged to us by our power supplier,” Pastolero said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the increase would be reflected in the August billing of consumers. Peco would support measures to cushion the effect of the additional charge, he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lawyer Jose Junio Jacela, the city legal officer, said the city government would file a motion for reconsideration to oppose the order.

“We believe that operating costs during the testing and commissioning stages of the coal plant are part of expenses that should be shouldered by investors and not passed on to consumers,” Jacela said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said if the city government could not stop the rate increase, it would seek a deferment or a longer collection period to reduce the amount of the rate increase.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: coal, Electricity, power

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.