JBC: Aquino not bound to name most senior Supreme Court member as next CJ | Inquirer News

JBC: Aquino not bound to name most senior Supreme Court member as next CJ

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 02:23 AM June 19, 2012

President Benigno Aquino III. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The practice of appointing the most senior member of the Supreme Court as the next Chief Justice “may be good,” but President Benigno Aquino is not bound by the Constitution to observe the tradition, two members of the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC)  said Monday.

Senator Francis Escudero said the suggestion of former Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla that the replacement of dismissed Chief Justice Renato Corona should be the most senior member of the chamber was not stated in the Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s good to keep our options open, but I don’t want to prejudge my vote. If there are no [constitutional] prohibitions, we’re free to choose from inside or outside the court,” Escudero told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

“We’re not prohibited and bound by it because [the seniority rule] is not mentioned under the Constitution and the JBC rules. He (Lotilla) admitted himself that it was just a tradition and a practice,” he added.

Escudero also noted that the practice was not observed when Artemio Panganiban replaced Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. in 2005.

Article continues after this advertisement

Reynato Puno, who was eventually appointed to replace Davide by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in 2007, was then the most senior magistrate.

Article continues after this advertisement

Milagros Fernan-Cayosa, who represents the Integrated Bar of the Philippines in the JBC, said: “I think that’s his (Lotilla) personal opinion, but it does not detract from the fact that the President has  leeway to choose from within or outside the Supreme Court.”

Cayosa said while it was a “good tradition,” the public should respect the President’s prerogative to appoint the highest official of the judiciary.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: JBC, Judiciary, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.