Satisfaction with Aquino drops to +42 | Inquirer News

Satisfaction with Aquino drops to +42

/ 01:26 AM June 12, 2012

President Benigno Aquino III. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Net public satisfaction with President Benigno Aquino’s performance slid by seven percentage points from plus 49 in March to  plus 42 in May, the lowest rating in his two-year presidency, the most recent Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey showed.

The biggest drops in the President’s net satisfaction ratings were in Metro Manila, where it plunged by 34 percentage points (from +52 in March to +18 in May) and among members of Classes ABC, where it slid by 37 percentage points (from +62 to +25).

Article continues after this advertisement

The Palace, however, shrugged off the decline and insisted this would not deter Mr. Aquino from his fight against poverty and corruption.

FEATURED STORIES

“Regardless of whether it was up or down, the President would continue to do his job of pursuing inclusive growth in the economy and our crusade on anticorruption,” presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said.

Lacierda said  the drop in the President’s net satisfaction rating was “somewhat consistent,” but he found the steep drop in Metro Manila really surprising.

Article continues after this advertisement

“That’s something we cannot explain. Plus you must remember that during this time, prior to the survey, Mindanao was in a bit of a storm over power outages but in spite of that the President appeared to have major approval in Mindanao,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

But for some analysts, the rating was satisfactory.

Article continues after this advertisement

“[Plus 42] is still a good rating. I’ll be alarmed if it is lower than 10 or 20,” Earl G. Parreño, a political analyst at the Institute for Political and Electoral Reforms, said. “The dip in the President’s rating is to be expected because he is the visible representative of the government.”

Among the reasons Parreño cited for the decline were the people’s very high expectations of the President. “As you implement programs, there will always be difficulties.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The Second Quarter 2012 SWS  survey, conducted from May 24 to May 27, found 63 percent satisfied and 21 percent dissatisfied with the President’s performance, for a net rating of +42 compared to +64 net rating in November 2010.

The SWS, however, said the +42 rating was still good. It classifies ratings of +70 and above, “excellent”; +50 to +69, “very good,” and +30 to +49, “good.”

The President’s net satisfaction rating plunged in Metro Manila from +52 (72 percent satisfied, 20 percent dissatisfied) in March to +18 (48 percent satisfied, 30 percent dissatisfied) in May.

Mr. Aquino’s net satisfaction rating also fell among members of Classes ABC—from +62 (79 percent satisfied, 16 percent dissatisfied) in March to +25 (54 percent satisfied, 29 percent dissatisfied) in May.

The President’s ratings also declined across areas except in Mindanao, where it increased by 8 points from +53 (69 percent satisfied, 16 percent dissatisfied) in March to +61 (73 percent satisfied, 12 percent dissatisfied) in May.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In the Visayas, it decreased by 9 points from +50 (67 percent satisfied, 17 dissatisfied) in March to +41 (61 percent satisfied, 20 percent dissatisfied) in May. In Luzon outside Manila, it slipped from +45 (67 percent satisfied, 21 percent dissatisfied) in March to +41 (64 percent satisfied, 23 percent dissatisfied) in May. Kate Pedroso and Ana Roa, Inquirer Research and Christine O. Avendaño

TAGS: Government, Politics, SWS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.