CHR hits hasty clearance of raps vs soldiers | Inquirer News

CHR hits hasty clearance of raps vs soldiers

/ 03:09 AM May 30, 2012

CHR Chairperson Loretta Ann Rosales INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Chairperson Loretta Rosales has scored the chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines Human Rights Office (AFPHRO) for saying that the 84 cases of abuse filed against military personnel since 2010 did not have a leg to stand on.

Rosales, in a recent briefing, said she was “utterly dismayed” by the AFP’s statement that essentially dismissed the 84 cases filed in the CHR against AFP personnel.

Article continues after this advertisement

AFPHRO chief Colonel Domingo Tataan had said that the findings of its Board of Inquiry showed that the cases of human rights violations implicating military personnel were just accusations and there was no sufficient evidence against the soldiers.

FEATURED STORIES

“I find that unrealistic,” Rosales said. “How can the Board of Inquiry in two to three days or even a week validate and actually come up with a conclusion against 84 complaints from 15 regional offices and five more sub-offices of the CHR and say these are nothing?”

According to her, the AFPHRO’s claim was “an insult to the integrity of the work being done by the CHR.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Rosales said the task of validating and verifying the legitimacy of the complaints takes time and entails a lot of work. So dismissing them just like that was unfair.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It takes more than just the wink of an eye to come up with the legitimacy of these complaints,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

She made the statements in a recent briefing before she left for Geneva to attend the United Nations Human Rights Council’s second periodic review of the Philippines’ human rights record.

Carlos Conde of the New York-based Human Rights Watch said Tutaan’s claim was “misleading and obviously an outright lie,” as well as “self-serving.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The AFPHRO is not the final arbiter of human rights cases,” Conde said.

He said that if the AFP wanted to help improve the country’s human rights situation, it must cooperate with civilian authorities investigating extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and incidents of torture.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, Military

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.