No personal issues in defense motion to inhibit vs Angara—lawyer | Inquirer News

No personal issues in defense motion to inhibit vs Angara—lawyer

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 07:52 PM May 08, 2012

Edgardo Angara

Senator Edgardo Angara. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA, Philippines – The defense panel said Tuesday that there were no “personal issues” in the filing of the motion to inhibit against Senator Edgardo Angara.

The motion to inhibit was “not intended to hurt or damage the reputation of members involved in the impeachment proceedings,” Defense spokesman Rico Paolo Quicho told reporters in a press briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

The defense panel filed a motion to inhibit against Senator Angara on the basis of his son, Aurora Representative Juan Edgardo “Sonny” Angara, being a member of the prosecution panel as a spokesman.

FEATURED STORIES

Senator Angara said shortly after the start of Tuesday’s proceedings that he would not inhibit himself saying “I consider it as a constitutional duty on my part to act as a judge, and no persuasion can convince me that I should inhibit.”

Quicho said that they respected Senator Angara’s decision and maintained that they have no intention to disrespect, hurt, or put to shame any member of the court.

Article continues after this advertisement

When asked whether the motion to inhibit filed against Senator Angara was the last, Quicho said that they did not plan the motion and it only came about due to developments as the case progressed.

Article continues after this advertisement

He did not categorically say there would not be any more motions to inhibit against any of the other members of the Senate.

Article continues after this advertisement

Defense spokesman Tranquil Salvador said, “We assure you that we highly respect all the members of the senate as an impeachment court.”

He said that there are things that “need to be done, but respect [for the senate] remains whole and [they will fully] comply with all orders [of the Senate].”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Defense

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.