Marcos’ office approved P125M for OVP’s 2022 confidential fund

Marcos’ office approved P125M for OVP’s 2022 confidential fund – Tulfo

/ 02:02 PM September 26, 2023

Marcos' office approved P125M for OVP's 2022 confidential fund - Tulfo

Rep. Erwin Tulfo. Senate PRIB file photo / Bibo Nueva España

MANILA, Philippines — President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.’s office approved P125 million of the P250 million confidential fund (CF) requested by the Office of the Vice President (OVP) in 2022, ACT-CIS Party-list Representative Erwin Tulfo said on Tuesday.

During the plenary debates on the proposed budget for 2024 for the Office of the President (OP), ACT Teachers Representative France Castro questioned Tulfo on the procedures taken in releasing OVP’s CF.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tulfo was sponsoring to the plenary the proposed budget for OP amounting to P10.7 billion.

FEATURED STORIES

He reiterated the statement from the Marcos administration that OVP had made the request to the Department of Budget and Management (DBM).

Afterwards, DBM had recommended the proposal to OP for approval.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, only P125 million of the P250 million was granted by OP.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I would just like to explain the flow of the release of the P125 million confidential fund of OVP in 2022,” Tulfo said in Filipino.

“This is a request of the OVP, for a confidential fund, from the DBM,” he began.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The DBM then evaluated this request, and recommended to the OP, chargeable under the 2022 General Appropriations Act (GAA),” he went on.

“OP, meanwhile, approved the release of the P125 million, although the request was actually P250 (million), chargeable to the contingent funds under the 2022 GAA,” he recalled.

“What DBM did was to release P125 million from the contingent funds, and this was accepted by the Office of the Vice President, this P125 million,” he pointed out.

Tulfo had earlier been asked by Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman on the OVP’s request.

Lagman asked for a copy of the OVP’s request to DBM — which was eventually provided to the lawmaker before the House terminated plenary debates on OP’s budget.

After going over the documents, he noted that it appeared the budget requested was an addition to certain items within the OVP.

“This letter addressed to this Secretary of the Budget and Management is a request for augmentation of certain items in the Office of the Vice President and also it refers to confidential funds,” the lawmaker said.

“The question is, was there a proper augmentation? And the second question is, can confidential funds in the OVP be augmented when the 2022 GAA appropriated or allotted zero for this particular item of expenditure?” Lagman asked.

His office later released to the media copies of OVP’s request.

Based on the document, OVP had asked for a total of P403.4 million.

According to Lagman, the transfer of funds seems to be flawed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Constitution prohibits transfer of funds, except with respect to constitutional officers like the President relative to savings for augmentation,” he said.

“Consequently, it is unconstitutional for any transfer by one office to another, like the transfer of funds from the OP to the OVP,” he added.

APL/abc

RELATED STORIES

Makabayan bloc vows to question Sara Duterte over confidential fund use 

Lawmaker threatens VP Sara with impeach rap; Veep responds, ‘Enjoy’

DBM says OVP’s 2022 confidential funds technically not a fund transfer — Co 
Quimbo: Secret funds of OVP ‘legal’ 

TAGS: Bongbong Marcos, confidential fund, OVP

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.