Padilla's plea to senators vs Cha-cha at this time: 'Consider it, no political revisions' | Inquirer News

Padilla’s plea to senators vs Cha-cha at this time: ‘Consider it, no political revisions’

By: - Reporter / @zacariansINQ
/ 07:24 PM February 12, 2023

Padilla's plea on senators vs Cha-cha at this time: 'Consider it, no political revisions'

FILE PHOTO: Senator Robinhood Padilla during a hybrid hearing on Tuesday, February 7, 2023. – Padilla on Sunday, February 12, 2023, defended his resolution proposing economic amendments to the 1987 Constitution. (Voltaire F. Domingo/Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines — Senator Robinhood Padilla on Sunday defended his resolution proposing economic amendments to the 1987 Constitution.

This developed after several of his colleagues at the Senate expressed opposition to or were cool about his bid.

Article continues after this advertisement

Padilla said in a statement that Resolution of Both Houses No. 3, which he filed on February 8, is “strictly about our economy and investments” which would “bring jobs and livelihood” to Filipinos.

FEATURED STORIES

He urged some senators to “consider the resolution” as it contains no political provisions, like the extension of terms or the changing of the form of government.

READ: Robin Padilla wants con-ass to amend economic provisions of 1987 Constitution

Article continues after this advertisement

“While laws have been passed in the past Congress such as amendments to the Public Service Act and the Trade Liberalization Act, it cannot be denied that foreign investors still think twice about investing in the Philippines due to the Constitution’s current provisions,” the neophyte senator said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Also, we cannot discount the questions raised by some sectors about the constitutionality of the Public Service Act,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to him, amending the 1987 Constitution through a constituent assembly, or con-ass, “is the most practical and economical.” A con-ass would make the Senate and the House of Representatives vote separately on proposed amendments.

READ: Koko Pimentel, Grace Poe, Nancy Binay: Cha-cha is not needed at this time

Article continues after this advertisement

But senators who expressed their opposition to the changing of the country’s principal charter did not mention political revisions as their basis for rejecting the resolution.

What Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel III and Senators Grace Poe and Nancy Binay had said was that amending the1987  Constitution should not be a priority at this time since Filipinos are faced with daily struggles amid rising unemployment and inflation.

They also asserted that the proposed amendments to the charter have already been addressed with the passage of certain laws during the 18th Congress.

RELATED STORIES

Dela Rosa backs resolution amending the 1987 Constitution through con-ass

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

EXPLAINER: The process of Cha-cha and why we should monitor it

KGA
TAGS: Cha-cha, Con-Ass, Politics, Robin Padilla

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.