Monsod tells congressmen: Political dynasty a ‘lame excuse’ to amend 1987 Constitution

FILE PHOTO: Lawyer Christian Monsod, a constitutionalist and former chair of the Commission on Elections. Radyo Inquirer

MANILA, Philippines —Congress’ attempt to modify the Constitution of 1987 to combat the proliferation of political dynasties is a “lame excuse.”

Constitutionalist Christian Monsod emphasized the legislators’ flimsy argument on Thursday as the House of Representatives began hearings on amendment proposals to the country’s main charter.

Instead of tinkering with the 1987 Constitution, Monsod said legislators should instead approve a bill against political dynasties that would extend up to the fourth degree of affinity and which could be implemented in the upcoming barangay election.

A resource person during the hearing of the House committee on constitutional amendments on Thursday, Monsod told congressmen that the “real reason” for attempts to amend the 1987 Constitution could be self-interest.

“Real change cannot happen until we strike at the roots and not at the branches of the problem. Congress has not passed an anti-dynasty law for 35 years and blames the Constitution for the lapse. That is a lame excuse,” he pointed out.

“The real reason is self-interest, so instead of rushing to amend the Constitution, why don’t our legislators pass an anti-dynasty law, of say, four degrees for the barangay elections this year?” he asked.

Monsod, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution, likewise noted that it is ironic to amend the said fundamental law when it is the first Constitution created freely by Filipinos.

According to him, all previous Constitutions of the country were either short-lived, influenced by colonizers, or were done during a dictatorship. He added that the 1986 Edsa People Power Revolution set standards for the 1987 Constitution, although these standards are still not achieved to this day.

“The 1987 Constitution, the seventh in our history, was the first time we spoke to the world as a truly independent and democratic nation — the Biak na Bato and Malolos Constitutions were short-lived interruptions of colonial rule, the others were written under colonial rule, 1935; or under enemy occupation, 1943; or by a dictatorship, 1973; or the transition proclamation while this Constitution was being written in 1986,” Monsod said.

“The inspiration of the 1987 Constitution was Edsa, which wasn’t only about the restoration of democracy through peaceful means — to the poor, it was also the promise of a new social order that remains unfulfilled to this day.  We are still the laggards in our part of the world,” he added.

The House committee on constitutional amendments, headed by Cagayan de Oro 2nd District Rep. Rufus Rodriguez, held a hearing on several bills and resolutions seeking to constitute a constitutional convention and other amendments like changes to lawmakers’ term limits and the president and vice president.

READ: 5-year term for President, VP with reelection proposed

There are also proposals to do away with economic provisions that are supposedly restrictive.

READ: Bill eyes calling constitutional convention by December 2023

But the House’s Makabayan bloc condemned the Cha-cha moves amid an economic crisis. It also said that people should reject any attempt to extend the term of public officials.

READ: Makabayan bloc: Absurd to push for Cha-cha amid economic crisis

KGA/abc