DILG to probe BFP fire truck bidding | Inquirer News

DILG to probe BFP fire truck bidding

By: - Reporter / @JMangaluzINQ
/ 11:21 AM December 22, 2022

The DILG will investigate the allegedly “restrictive” bidding process of the BFP

| PHOTO: Bureau of Fire Protection official website

MANILA, Philippines — The Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) will investigate the allegedly “restrictive” bidding process of the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) for its fire trucks, an official said Thursday.

This developed after the Makabayan Bloc filed a bill calling for an investigation of the BFP’s procurement process, noting that its “restrictive procurement process practically gives undue advantage since 2018 to only two joint venture entities.”

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: ‘Restrictive’ bidding for fire trucks bared

FEATURED STORIES

“Gagawain po namin ngayon, co-conduct kami ng sarili naming investigation para malaman naming kung anong mga nangyari nung nakaraan, and sa ngayon po naman, mayroon pong mga complaints o charges na nai-file sa Ombudsman,” said DILG Undersecretary for Public Safety Serafin Barretto Jr. in an interview on ANC.

(What we will do now, we will conduct our own investigation to know what happened in the past, and right now, there are complaints or charges filed before the Ombudsman.)

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Barretto, complaints were filed against the BFP and its Bids and Awards Committee members but he did not elaborate which officials are facing charges and what kinds of complaints were filed. He also said that he does not know who filed the complaints yet.

Article continues after this advertisement

Because the BFP is under the jurisdiction of the DILG, however, Barretto said they have been communicating with the bureau about the matter.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sinasabi nila na ligal ang kanilang mga process dahil independent procuring entity naman talaga sila,” said Barretto.

(They said that their processes are legal because they are an independent procuring entity).

Article continues after this advertisement

The Makabayan bloc’s resolution also pointed out that bidders were limited to those involved in first truck assembly and manufacturing for at least 15 years, therefore only allowing two companies to qualify for bidding. According to lawmakers, this created a duopoly that defeated the purpose of competitiveness in the bidding process.

“The bidding process is subject to collusion by the procuring entities and some parties, genuine free and open competition as mandated by the law is impossible,” the resolution reads.

When asked about this, Barretto said that the provision was already scrapped this year under the new administration.

“Sa ngayon po, natigil na po ‘yan. Sa new term of reference, wala pong ganong requirements na 15 years,” said Barretto.

(For now, that was stopped. In the new term of reference, there is no such requirement of 15 years).

The DILG also welcomed the proposed investigation of the House of Representatives.

“Welcome naman ‘yan para sa amin. Mas maganda nga ‘yon eh, para mas malinaw sa taumbayan na ayan, may ginagawa ang pamahalaan para labanan kung may anomalya,” said Barretto.

(That is welcome for us. That is better so that it is clearer to the people that we are doing something to fight anomalies).

RELATED STORIES

PS-DBM, PITC blamed over ‘undelivered’ BFP procurements from 2015 to 2017

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

BFP has P 4.1-billion in ‘parked funds’ at PS-DBM, PITC

TAGS: BFP, bidding, DILG, Fire trucks

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.