SC justices warn lawyers: No online posting of communications with clients | Inquirer News
Selfies on social media are OK

SC justices warn lawyers: No online posting of communications with clients

/ 05:29 PM December 14, 2022

No online posting of communications with clients Supreme Court

Supreme Court justices warns lawyers not to post their conversations with clients online. (Photo by Tetch Torres-Tupas/INQUIRER.net)

MANILA, Philippines – Posting selfies online are okay even for lawyers but not their communications with clients which Supreme Court justices on Wednesday said violates the lawyer-client privilege and may result in their disbarment.

Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen told reporters that they noticed some lawyers are posting on social media communications with their clients such as letters, text messages, and even gifts from their clients or photos of documents that they intend to file in court.

FEATURED STORIES

“Selfies are okay, but lately, we have been noticing that lawyers posting photos of letters from their clients who liked their work, or they will post about documents they will be filing in court. They are probably excited, but bawal yan [that is not allowed],” Leonen said.

Leonen joined Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo and Associate Justices Jose Midas Marquez and Japar Dimaampao during the SC Meets the Press: Dialogue and Thanksgiving event.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mostly young lawyers, he said, are probably posting communications on social media “just to brag,” but such actions are “absolutely prohibited.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“We need to preserve the confidentiality between lawyers and clients because once you post, you are actually opening third parties to your communication, which is actionable,” Leonen explained.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The tolerance of the Supreme Court on this has been stretched and sooner or later baka merong isa o dalawa na ma-file-an ng disbarment case [sooner or later a disbarment case may be filed against one or two (lawyers)] because they actually violated attorney-client privileged,” he said.

He also reminded lawyers to respect the judiciary and “hold back a bit” on commentaries about pending cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

“What’s more important is to maintain the aura of justice rather than showing arrogance that they are smarter,” Leonen also said.

RELATED STORIES

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

SC condemns attacks on lawyers, judges; requests info from lower courts

Tulfo pushes for digitized courts, more online hearings

/MUF
TAGS: lawyers, online, Social Media, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.