OVP not entitled to intel funds – Pimentel, Hontiveros | Inquirer News

OVP not entitled to intel funds – Pimentel, Hontiveros

Sara Duterte STORY: OVP not entitled to intel funds – Pimentel, Hontiveros

Sara Duterte —SENATE PRIB

MANILA, Philippines — Senate Minority Leader Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III on Monday called on his colleagues to delete the proposed P500 million in confidential funds for the Office of the Vice President (OVP), as the agency, as defined by Congress, is not entitled to receive such funding.

In his interpellation of the OVP budget, Pimentel said Congress should instead rechannel the funds for more important programs and allow agencies to perform their mandate.

Article continues after this advertisement

He questioned why the Senate committee report retained the P2.3 billion funding for Vice President Sara Duterte, which “ballooned” from the P709 million originally proposed by the agency.

FEATURED STORIES

“In due time, I will move for the deletion of the budget item of P500 million for the OVP. It is my position that the OVP is not entitled to confidential funds, going by the definition that we in Congress crafted,” he said.

The Senate finance committee approved the referral of its committee report on the budget of the OVP supposedly without any change from the previously proposed P2.3 billion.

Article continues after this advertisement

Budget almost triple

Pimentel noted that in the budget briefing, Duterte did not try to justify the proposed P500 million confidential fund for her office, contrasted to how the Office of the President stood firm on their justification of the P4.5-billion confidential and intelligence funds.

Article continues after this advertisement

Citing the OVP’s proposals, Pimentel expressed concern that the agency may already be duplicating other programs already performed by other agencies.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So that will explain the budget will almost triple from current amounts because of these programs that the OVP seeks to undertake,” he said.

Aquilino Pimentel III

Aquilino Pimentel III

Sen. Risa Hontiveros, for her part, disclosed that the Senate finance panel has added nearly P1 billion to the 2023 budget of the Department of Education (DepEd), as she insisted that the Education Secretary and Vice President’s request for P150 million in confidential funds was not justified.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hontiveros appealed to her colleagues to just siphon off the confidential funds to other concerns, such as the education programs for indigenous people and students with special needs.

No compelling reasons

Netizens earlier blasted the government after the DepEd’s proposed outlay of P532 million for the special education was not included in the National Expenditure Program for next year.

“I hope our colleagues in the Senate will share the view that there are no extraordinarily compelling reasons to provide a confidential fund to the education agency,” Hontiveros said.

While she was supportive of the DepEd’s efforts to provide quality basic education, the senator said education officials should be more prudent in utilizing taxpayer money allocated for Filipino learners.

“These confidential funds will be better spent for the important needs of the young students,” Hontiveros added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

She lauded her colleagues, particularly Sen. Pia Cayetano, for introducing amendments that increased the DepEd’s outlay by P912 million.

RELATED STORIES

Big intel funds for OVP, DepEd, OSG risky–Koko Pimentel

Drilon to Congress: Check Marcos admin’s P9.3B secret, intel funds judiciously

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.