US Republican McConnell backs Jan. 6-linked electoral reform bill | Inquirer News

US Republican McConnell backs Jan. 6-linked electoral reform bill

/ 07:23 AM September 28, 2022

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to reporters following the Senate Republicans weekly policy lunch at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 20, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to reporters following the Senate Republicans weekly policy lunch at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 20, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday voiced qualified support for a bipartisan Senate bill to clarify Congress’ role in certifying presidential election results, calling it the only chance to prevent any future chaos like the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol assault.

“I’ll proudly support the legislation provided that nothing more than practical changes are made to its current form,” McConnell said in a floor speech.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This bill, as introduced, is the only chance to get an outcome and to actually make law,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

Fourteen lawmakers from both parties on the Senate Rules Committee, including McConnell himself, later voted on Tuesday to approve the bill for an eventual floor vote.

Former President Donald Trump’s supporters launched a deadly attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6 in a bid to stop Congress from certifying his election defeat, which the then-president falsely claimed was the result of widespread fraud. They trained their anger on then-Vice President Mike Pence, urging him to reject the results, an authority that Pence said he did not hold.

Article continues after this advertisement

The bill would make clear that the vice president’s role in certification is purely ceremonial and would require one-fifth of the House of Representatives and the Senate to agree to challenge a state’s results. Current law allows objections to proceed with the support of just one lawmaker from each chamber.

Article continues after this advertisement

Only Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican who had objected to President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory on Jan. 6, 2021, voted against the legislation in the rules committee on Tuesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

McConnell’s remarks appeared to warn Democrats against altering the bill, known as the Electoral Count Reform Act, which already seems to have enough co-sponsors from each party to secure the 60 votes necessary for passage in the evenly split 100-seat chamber.

Lawmakers expect to enact reform legislation before the end of the year. But they will need to confront differences between the Senate bill and similar legislation that passed the House last week, before a final bill can be sent to Democratic President Joe Biden for his signature.

Article continues after this advertisement

House Republicans opposed their chamber’s version of the bill, arguing that it goes too far.

New legislation would reform the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which contains vague language on certification that Trump and his supporters sought to use to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory.

In addition to the Jan. 6 violence, 139 House Republicans and eight Senate Republicans including Cruz voted to challenge results in key states.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The House bill would require at least one-third of the members of the House and Senate to agree to challenge a state’s certification.

RELATED STORY:

US Capitol riot probe puts Trump at heart of ‘attempted coup’

TAGS: Donald Trump

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.