Constitution is not revised willy-nilly, says Nat'l Security Adviser Carlos | Inquirer News

Constitution is not revised willy-nilly, says Nat’l Security Adviser Carlos

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 05:26 PM September 02, 2022

CARLOS ATTENDS HEARING ON CHARTER REVIEW: National Security Adviser Clarita Carlos physically attends the continuation of the hybrid hearing of the Committee on Constitutional Amendments and Revision of Codes Friday, September 2, 2022 on proposals to revisit the 1987 Constitution. (Voltaire F. Domingo/Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines— The 1987 Constitution cannot be revised willy-nilly or piece by piece, National Security Adviser Clarita Carlos said on Friday.

Suppose there is a need to change the Constitution. In that case, it should be an omnibus revision, Carlos said during the Senate committee hearing on constitutional amendments and revision of codes on Charter change proposal.

Article continues after this advertisement

“When we are going to revise the Constitution, dapat omnibus ang revision mo kasi bawat section dun na papalitan mo ay meron syang mga pinsan sa other sections. Magmo-move lahat sya e. They will all be moving parts,” she said.

FEATURED STORIES

“So I’m sorry, I apologize if I go against the notion that you can in fact revise the Constitution piecemeal, you can’t. Otherwise we will be wasting our time, and some other time we will again revise the Constitution and we don’t like to do that.”

Carlos stressed that the Constitution is the nation’s supreme law and must not be changed on a whim.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s not revised willy-nilly,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s not as if you know ganito ang kapritso natin ngayon, we change it. No, we don’t. We’re changing it because we want structural change. We want structural change because we want behavior change,” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Being part of a group doing political education as early as 1989, Carlos underscored the need to have an informed citizenry about proposals to change the Constitution.

She said her group was neither advocating a federal nor parliamentary form of government.

Article continues after this advertisement

But during the hearing, Carlos centered her discussions on the possible shift to a parliamentary system from the current presidential form of government.

She said there will be “no notion of term limits in a parliamentary system.”

“If you’re elected as a member of parliament, you can be elected as long as you’re alive or can continue to discourse in parliament,” she said.

“No term limits. Even political dynasties will be irrelevant,” she further said, noting that there are only political dynasties because of term limits.

However, Carlos said the prime minister and government may be ousted under a parliamentary form of government based on a single policy decision.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“You don’t need people power. You just oust him,” she said, responding to the query of committee chairman Senator Robin Padilla.

/MUF/abc
TAGS: NSA

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.